Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20590665›Full record

ArticleCell proliferation2010

Differential proteome and phosphoproteome signatures in human T-lymphoblast cells induced by sirolimus.

F C Schultze, D T Petrova, M Oellerich, V W Armstrong, A R Asif

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell proliferation, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

F C SchultzeDepartment of Clinical Chemistry, University Medicine Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.
D T Petrova
M Oellerich
V W Armstrong
A R Asif

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe present study was designed to investigate early proteome and phosphoproteome changes during inhibition of lymphocyte proliferation induced by sirolimus (SRL). MATERIALS AND

methodsProliferation assays were conducted using human CCRF-CEM T lymphoblasts under different SRL concentrations. Total protein lysates after SRL treatment were used to identify significantly regulated proteins and phosphorylated proteins by 2-DE and Q-TOF Ultima Global mass spectrometer. RESULTS AND

conclusionsIncubation with 2.5 micromol/l SRL resulted in a approximately 70% inhibition of cell proliferation. Cells incubated with 2.5 micromol/l for 30 min showed a differential phosphorylation pattern with one higher (TCPQ) and six lower phosphorylation signals (TBA1B, VIME, HNRPD, ENPL, SEPT9, PLSL). On investigating the differential protein expression, five proteins were found to be up-regulated (ECHB, PSB3, MTDC, LDHB and NDKA) and four were down-regulated (EHD1, AATC, LMNB1 and MDHC). Nine of these differentially regulated proteins/phosphoproteins (TCPQ, TBA1B, VIME, HNRPD, ENPL, ECHB, PSB3, LDHB and LMNB1) showed significant interaction potential, through binding protein YWHAZ using MINT software.

conclusionsWe report for the first time the simultaneous early influence of SRL on phosphorylation status and on protein expression in the total proteome of CCRF-CEM T lymphoblasts and predict that 56% of the proteins interact with each other, highlighting significance of these results.

Indexed as

Cell ProliferationHumansLymphocyte ActivationLymphocytesPhosphoproteinsPhosphorylationProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalProteomeSignal TransductionSirolimusPhosphoproteinsProteomeSirolimus

Identifiers

PMID20590665
PMCPMC6496580
OpenAlexW1585111937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.