ArticleCell proliferation2010
p53-dependent G(1) arrest in 1st or 2nd cell cycle may protect human cancer cells from cell death after treatment with ionizing radiation and Chk1 inhibitors.
Article in Cell proliferation, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Selective inhibition of DNA ligase IV provides additional efficacy to the treatment of anaplastic thyroid cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Targeting lung cancer through inhibition of checkpoint kinases.Frontiers in genetics · 2015Article
- DNA damage response pathways and cell cycle checkpoints in colorectal cancer: current concepts and future perspectives for targeted treatment.Current cancer drug targets · 2012Review
- Selective tumor killing based on specific DNA-damage response deficiencies.Cancer biology & therapy · 2012Review
- Mechanism-based screen establishes signalling framework for DNA damage-associated G1 checkpoint response.PloS one · 2012Article
- Safeguarding genome integrity: the checkpoint kinases ATR, CHK1 and WEE1 restrain CDK activity during normal DNA replication.Nucleic acids research · 2012Review
- Understanding the limitations of radiation-induced cell cycle checkpoints.Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology · 2011Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study was performed to explore the strategy of combining Chk1 inhibitors with ionizing radiation (IR) to selectively target p53-deficient cancer cells. MATERIALS AND
methodsSurvival and cell cycle progression were measured in response to IR and the Chk1 inhibitors, UCN-01 and CEP-3891, in colon carcinoma HCT116 p53+/+ and p53-/- cells, and in osteosarcoma U2OS-VP16 cells with conditional expression of dominant-negative p53 (p53DD).
resultsClonogenic survival was selectively reduced in HCT116 p53-/- compared to p53+/+ cells after treatment with UCN-01 and IR, and HCT116 p53+/+ cells also displayed strong p53-dependent G(1) arrest in the 1st cell cycle after IR. In contrast, clonogenic survival was affected similarly in U2OS-VP16 cells with and without expression of p53DD. However, death of U2OS-VP16 cells was p53 dependent as assessed by cell viability assay at 72 h, and this was associated with p53-dependent G(1) arrest in the 2nd cell cycle after treatment. Notably, HCT116 cells were overall more resistant than U2OS cells to cytotoxic effects of Chk1 inhibitors.
conclusionOur results suggest that p53-dependent G(1) arrest in both 1st and 2nd cell cycles may protect human cancer cells from cell death after treatment with IR and Chk1 inhibitors. However, a challenge for future clinical use will be that different cancers display different intrinsic sensitivity to such inhibitors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.