ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology2010
Being mindful of seven-transmembrane receptor 'guests' when assessing agonist selectivity.
Article in British journal of pharmacology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Equilibrium and Kinetic Measurements of Ligand Binding to HiBiT-tagged GPCRs on the Surface of Living Cells.Bio-protocol · 2020Article
- Identifying ligand-specific signalling within biased responses: focus on δ opioid receptor ligands.British journal of pharmacology · 2015Review
- Label-free integrative pharmacology on-target of opioid ligands at the opioid receptor family.BMC pharmacology & toxicology · 2013Article
- Investigation of D₂ receptor-agonist interactions using a combination of pharmacophore and receptor homology modeling.ChemMedChem · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The time-honored approach of quantifying agonist selectivity through measurement of agonist affinity with binding and efficacy through potency ratios in model assays for prediction of effect in therapeutic systems can fall short of providing useful answers for functionally selective agonists. Agonists are now known to have pluridimensional efficacies that are associated with selected signalling pathways coupled to the receptor. This necessitates specifically tailored assay formats to measure pre-determined efficacies of ligands to characterize agonist selectivity fully. If such assays can access signalling that directly emanates from the interaction of the agonist-bound receptor and a cytosolic signalling protein, then the Black/Leff operational model can be used to specifically quantify 'transduction ratios' (tau/K(A)) that fully characterize selective activation of signalling pathways by a given agonist. As whole-cell processing of pleiotropic signalling cascades imposes cell-specific phenotypic agonist profiles, ultimately the assessment of agonist selectivity is most reliably done in the therapeutically relevant primary cell system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.