Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20590559›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of pharmacology2010

The endocannabinoid system as a target for the treatment of neurodegenerative disease.

Emma L Scotter, Mary E Abood, Michelle Glass

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of pharmacology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Cannabinoids for the treatment of dementia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Emma L ScotterCentre for Brain Research and Department of Pharmacology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Mary E Abood
Michelle Glass

Funding

THE ROLE OF ENDOGENOUS OPIOIDS IN SUDDEN INFANT DEATHP50DA005274 · NIDA · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI DELORENZO, ROBERT JOHN · 1988 to 2011
$12.6M
MOLECULAR MECHANISMS OF CANNABINOID RECEPTOR REGULATIONR01DA009978 · NIDA · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI ABOOD, MARY E · 1996 to 2006
$1.1M
Anandamide Receptors: Role in Motor Neuron ProtectionR21NS041639 · NINDS · CALIFORNIA PACIFIC MED CTR RES INSTITUTE · PI ABOOD, MARY E · 2003 to 2004
$450k
NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA005274NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA009978NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS041639
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Cannabis sativa plant has been exploited for medicinal, agricultural and spiritual purposes in diverse cultures over thousands of years. Cannabis has been used recreationally for its psychotropic properties, while effects such as stimulation of appetite, analgesia and anti-emesis have lead to the medicinal application of cannabis. Indeed, reports of medicinal efficacy of cannabis can been traced back as far as 2700 BC, and even at that time reports also suggested a neuroprotective effect of the cultivar. The discovery of the psychoactive component of cannabis resin, Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (Delta(9)-THC) occurred long before the serendipitous identification of a G-protein coupled receptor at which Delta(9)-THC is active in the brain. The subsequent finding of endogenous cannabinoid compounds, the synthesis of which is directed by neuronal excitability and which in turn served to regulate that excitability, further widened the range of potential drug targets through which the endocannabinoid system can be manipulated. As a result of this, alterations in the endocannabinoid system have been extensively investigated in a range of neurodegenerative disorders. In this review we examine the evidence implicating the endocannabinoid system in the cause, symptomatology or treatment of neurodegenerative disease. We examine data from human patients and compare and contrast this with evidence from animal models of these diseases. On the basis of this evidence we discuss the likely efficacy of endocannabinoid-based therapies in each disease context.

Indexed as

EndocannabinoidsAnimalsCannabinoid Receptor ModulatorsCannabinoidsDisease Models, AnimalDrug Delivery SystemsHumansNeurodegenerative DiseasesReceptors, CannabinoidCannabinoid Receptor ModulatorsCannabinoidsEndocannabinoidsReceptors, Cannabinoid

Identifiers

PMID20590559
PMCPMC2931550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.