Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20589765›Full record

ArticleEuropean eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association

All better? How former anorexia nervosa patients define recovery and engaged in treatment.

Alison M Darcy, Shaina Katz, Kathleen Kara Fitzpatrick, Sarah Forsberg, Linsey Utzinger, James Lock

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Early intervention for adolescents with anorexia nervosa: Pilot evaluation of an outpatient group therapy prior to inpatient treatment.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Treatment of eating disorders: voices from a ward.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alison M DarcyDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA 94305, USA. adarcy@stanford.edu
Shaina Katz
Kathleen Kara Fitzpatrick
Sarah Forsberg
Linsey Utzinger
James Lock

Funding

Mentoring and Research in Adolescent Eating DisordersK24MH074467 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI LOCK, JAMES D · 2005 to 2014
$1.9M
NIMH NIH HHS K24 MH074467
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to explore how individuals with anorexia nervosa (AN) engage in treatment and define recovery. A mixed methods design was used to triangulate the experience of 20 women with a history of AN. Interview data were analysed thematically to explore frequency of emergent themes and current eating disorder psychopathology was assessed using standardized self-report measures. Participants' mean age was 29.35 (SD = 12.11). Participants' scores were indicative of persistent psychopathology. Those with more involvement in treatment choice had better motivation to change and normalized eating. Participants' definition of recovery mapped on well to current research conceptualizations, though a substantial proportion of the group expressed some ambivalence around the concept. Results are interpreted in the context of self-determination theory of motivation and suggest that patients should be involved collaboratively in the formulation of shared goals and concepts of recovery in treatment settings.

Indexed as

MotivationAdultAnorexia NervosaChi-Square DistributionFeeding BehaviorFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPatient ParticipationQuality of LifeRecovery of FunctionSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID20589765
PMCPMC3014529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.