Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20589718›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental psychobiology2010

Kinematic analysis of overground locomotion in chicks incubated under different light conditions.

Anil Sindhurakar, Nina S Bradley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental psychobiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anil SindhurakarProgram in Systems Biology and Disease, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. sindhura@usc.edu
Nina S Bradley

Funding

Development and control of repetitive leg movements during embryonic developmentR01HD053367 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI BRADLEY, NINA S · 2006 to 2008
$395k
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD-053367NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD053367
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Domestic chicks walk within 3-4 hr after hatching following 21 days of incubation. However, differences in light exposure can vary incubation duration. Based on pilot studies, we predicted that there would be a positive relationship between incubation duration and locomotor competence at hatching. Embryos were incubated in one of three conditions that varied light duration and intensity, and overground locomotor performance was tested on the day of hatching. Chicks incubated in continuous bright light hatched 1-2 days earlier than chicks incubated in less or no light. Kinematic findings indicated that locomotor skill was similar across incubation conditions and led us to reject our hypothesis. We propose that light may accelerate locomotor development without adversely affecting skill. Our findings raise two important implications for future studies: whether light exposure accelerates locomotor circuit development; and/or it unmasks adaptive motor skill by accelerating development of other physiological systems.

Indexed as

IncubatorsLightAnalysis of VarianceAnimalsAnimals, NewbornBiomechanical PhenomenaChickensDarknessEnvironmentLocomotionTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID20589718
PMCPMC9965085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.