Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20589483›Full record

ReviewCurrent allergy and asthma reports2010

Risk factors, predictors, and markers for work-related asthma and rhinitis.

Denyse Gautrin, Jean-Luc Malo

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current allergy and asthma reports, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Biomarkers in Occupational Asthma.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2016
    Review
  2. Pollen aero allergens and the climate in Mediterranean region and allergen sensitivity in allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and allergic asthma patients.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Denyse GautrinUniversité de Montréal, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, 5400 Gouin Boulevard West, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. d.gautrin@umontreal.ca
Jean-Luc Malo
Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal · CAUniversité de Montréal · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The burden of asthma attributable to occupational exposures is significant. A better evaluation of markers of asthma and rhinitis in occupational settings may help reduce the frequency of occupational asthma (OA) and rhinitis (OR). This publication reviews articles published in 2008 and 2009 to provide an update on aspects related to markers of asthma and rhinitis. Markers derived from occupational exposure assessment, questionnaires, clinical data, and noninvasive tests such as functional tests or measures of serum antibodies are used to develop prediction models for the likelihood of OA and OR development. Findings from prospective studies highlight the course of preclinical signs and markers of airway inflammation in the natural history of OA and OR. Airway inflammation, evaluated by quantification of cells and mediators in induced sputum or nasal lavage and by exhaled nitric oxide, is associated with OA and OR; however, the sensitivity and specificity of these means, especially exhaled nitric oxide, have not been sufficiently assessed.

Indexed as

AllergensAntibody SpecificityAsthmaBiomarkersEarly DiagnosisGlobal HealthHumansImmunoglobulin EImmunoglobulin GInflammationOccupational DiseasesOccupational ExposurePrognosisRespiratory SystemRhinitis, Allergic, PerennialRisk FactorsAllergensBiomarkersImmunoglobulin EImmunoglobulin G

Identifiers

PMID20589483
OpenAlexW1967165289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.