Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20587499›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2010

Road blocks on paleogenomes--polymerase extension profiling reveals the frequency of blocking lesions in ancient DNA.

Patricia Heyn, Udo Stenzel, Adrian W Briggs, Martin Kircher, Michael Hofreiter, Matthias Meyer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Why Formalin-fixed, Paraffin-embedded Biospecimens Must Be Used in Genomic Medicine: An Evidence-based Review and Conclusion.The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A Robust Framework for Microbial Archaeology.Annual review of genomics and human genetics · 2017
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Reconstructing ancient genomes and epigenomes.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2015
    Review
  10. Ancient genomics.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2015
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Ancient DNA damage.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2013
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Patricia HeynMax Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Deutscher Platz 6, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany. heyn@mpi-cbg.de
Udo Stenzel
Adrian W Briggs
Martin Kircher
Michael Hofreiter
Matthias Meyer

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the last few years have seen great progress in DNA sequence retrieval from fossil specimens, some of the characteristics of ancient DNA remain poorly understood. This is particularly true for blocking lesions, i.e. chemical alterations that cannot be bypassed by DNA polymerases and thus prevent amplification and subsequent sequencing of affected molecules. Some studies have concluded that the vast majority of ancient DNA molecules carry blocking lesions, suggesting that the removal, repair or bypass of blocking lesions might dramatically increase both the time depth and geographical range of specimens available for ancient DNA analysis. However, previous studies used very indirect detection methods that did not provide conclusive estimates on the frequency of blocking lesions in endogenous ancient DNA. We developed a new method, polymerase extension profiling (PEP), that directly reveals occurrences of polymerase stalling on DNA templates. By sequencing thousands of single primer extension products using PEP methodology, we have for the first time directly identified blocking lesions in ancient DNA on a single molecule level. Although we found clear evidence for blocking lesions in three out of four ancient samples, no more than 40% of the molecules were affected in any of the samples, indicating that such modifications are far less frequent in ancient DNA than previously thought.

Indexed as

DNA DamageDNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseFossilsGenomicsPolymerase Chain ReactionSequence Analysis, DNATemplates, GeneticDNA-Directed DNA Polymerase

Identifiers

PMID20587499
PMCPMC2938203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.