Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20587339›Full record

ArticleDiscovery medicine2010

Modeling stromal-epithelial interactions in disease progression.

Douglas W Strand, Simon W Hayward

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Discovery medicine, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Study Models forMicroorganisms · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Remodeling the Microenvironment before Occurrence and Metastasis of Cancer.International journal of biological sciences · 2019
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Douglas W StrandDivision of Urologic Surgery, Vanderbilt University, 1161 21st Avenue S, Nashville, TN 37232, USA. doug.strand@vanderbilt.edu
Simon W Hayward

Funding

MULTIDISCIPLINARY BASIC RESEARCH TRAINING IN CANCERT32CA009592 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI Justin M Balko, Julie A Rhoades (Sterling) · 1987 to 2026
$10.4M
Protein Collection and Proteomics Integrative Shared ResourceU54CA126505 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI MATRISIAN, LYNN M · 2006 to 2010
$8.2M
Paracrine Regulation of BPH PathogenesisR01DK067049 · NIDDK · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI HAYWARD, SIMON W · 2004 to 2013
$2.6M
NCI NIH HHS CA126505NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009592NCI NIH HHS U54 CA126505NIDDK NIH HHS 2R01 DK67049-05NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK067049
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of tumor stroma in progression to malignancy has become the subject of intense experimental and clinical interest. The stromal compartment of organs is composed of all the non-epithelial cell types and maintains the proper architecture and nutrient levels required for epithelial and, ultimately, organ function. The composition of the reactive stroma surrounding tumors is vastly different from normal stromal tissue. Stromal phenotype can be correlated with, and predictive of, disease recurrence. In addition, the stroma is now seen as a legitimate target for therapeutic intervention. Although much has been learned about the role of the stromal compartment in development and disease in recent years, a number of key questions remain. Here we review how some of these questions are beginning to be addressed using new models of stromal-epithelial interaction.

Indexed as

AnimalsDisease ProgressionEpithelial CellsHumansMiceMice, TransgenicModels, BiologicalStromal Cells

Identifiers

PMID20587339
PMCPMC4195242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.