ArticleJournal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS2010
Evaluation of a commercial colorimetric fecal dipstick assay for the detection of Helicobacter hepaticus infections in laboratory mice.
Article in Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mice used in biomedical research typically are tested for the presence of Helicobacter spp., including Helicobacter hepaticus. Here we evaluated the ability of a commercially available colorimetric Helicobacter dipstick assay to detect H. hepaticus in experimentally and naturally infected mice, with use of a Helicobacter PCR assay as the 'gold standard' test. None of the fecal samples from experimentally infected A/JCr mice (n = 12) tested positive for Helicobacter by the colorimetric dipstick test. In naturally infected A/JCr and C57BL/6 mice, 11% (1 of 9) and 30% (3 of 10) of fecal samples, respectively, tested positive for Helicobacter by the colorimetric dipstick assay. In these 3 groups of H. hepaticus-infected mice, statistically fewer mice tested positive by the colorimetric dipstick test than by PCR. The colorimetric Helicobacter dipstick assay had an overall diagnostic sensitivity of 13%, diagnostic specificity of 94%, and analytical sensitivity of 10(8) H. hepaticus cfu/mL. As currently formulated, the colorimetric dipstick assay had high specificity but lacked sensitivity for detecting H. hepaticus infections in 2 strains of mice commonly used in research, thereby limiting its utility as a diagnostic screening test for H. hepaticus infections in research mice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
20587162PMC2877303W294353182What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.