Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20587085›Full record

ArticleArthritis research & therapy2010

The enigma that is the nucleus pulposus cell: the search goes on.

W Mark Erwin

Open access · goldAbstract readCommentEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Arthritis research & therapy, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The cellular and molecular biology of the intervertebral disc: A clinician's primer.The Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association · 2014
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. The evolutionary importance of cell ratio between notochordal and nucleus pulposus cells: an experimental 3-D co-culture study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

W Mark Erwin
University of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of an effective treatment for degenerative disc disease has been hampered for many years by what seems a fundamental problem; what exactly defines a nucleus pulposus (NP) cell? The paper by Gilson and colleagues elegantly re-opens the debate concerning the lineage and identity of NP cells that are alike yet different from chondrocytes. As we pursue novel investigations and treatment strategies for degenerative disc disease, how do we isolate these unique cells and what is the role of the primordial notochordal cell that may well linger within the NP far longer and perhaps in a different phenotypic appearance than previously thought? The paper by Gilson and colleagues that is the subject of the present editorial presents compelling data concerning the heterogeneity of the cells of the NP, and their origin, development, maturation and function.

Indexed as

Cell LineageChondrocytesHumansIntervertebral DiscNotochordRegenerative MedicineTissue Engineering

Identifiers

PMID20587085
PMCPMC2911858
OpenAlexW2037487395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.