ReviewJournal of agricultural and food chemistry2011
Herbicide-resistant crops: utilities and limitations for herbicide-resistant weed management.
Review in Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
42 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evolution and Future Directions in Herbicide-Resistant Crop Development and Weed Management.Rice (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Review
- Nanoemulsion of Apium graveolens essential oil as a natural pre-emergent herbicide.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Herbicides in Use: Current Status and Perspectives in the Different Biogeographic Regions of Europe.Journal of agricultural and food chemistry · 2025Review
- Exploring the Biocontrol Potential of FungusPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Natural Rubrolides and Their Synthetic Congeners as Inhibitors of the Photosynthetic Electron Transport Chain.Journal of natural products · 2024Article
- Tissue Culture Innovations for Propagation and Conservation of Myrteae-A Globally Important Myrtaceae Tribe.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Review
- Transformative Approaches for Sustainable Weed Management: The Power of Gene Drive and CRISPR-Cas9.Genes · 2023Review
- Identification and Expression Analysis ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Transcriptome Analysis Reveals the Response Mechanism ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Gut Microbiota as Well as Metabolomes of Wistar Rats Recover within Two Weeks after Doripenem Antibiotic Treatment.Microorganisms · 2023Article
- Article
- CRISPR/Cas9-mediated homology donor repair base editing confers glyphosate resistance to rice (Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Synthesis of Cyclotetrapeptides Analogues to Natural Products as Herbicides.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Effect of Mycotoxin Cytochalasin A on Photosystem II inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Ectopic expression of a rice triketone dioxygenase gene confers mesotrione tolerance in soybean.Pest management science · 2022Article
- Integrated transcriptomic and metabolomic analyses of the molecular mechanisms of two highland barley genotypes with pyroxsulam responses.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Bio-herbicidal potential of wheat rhizosphere bacteria onBioengineered · 2021Article
- Herbicide Resistance: Another Hot Agronomic Trait for Plant Genome Editing.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Challenges for Adoption of Integrated Pest Management (IPM): the Soybean Example.Neotropical entomology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since 1996, genetically modified herbicide-resistant (HR) crops, particularly glyphosate-resistant (GR) crops, have transformed the tactics that corn, soybean, and cotton growers use to manage weeds. The use of GR crops continues to grow, but weeds are adapting to the common practice of using only glyphosate to control weeds. Growers using only a single mode of action to manage weeds need to change to a more diverse array of herbicidal, mechanical, and cultural practices to maintain the effectiveness of glyphosate. Unfortunately, the introduction of GR crops and the high initial efficacy of glyphosate often lead to a decline in the use of other herbicide options and less investment by industry to discover new herbicide active ingredients. With some exceptions, most growers can still manage their weed problems with currently available selective and HR crop-enabled herbicides. However, current crop management systems are in jeopardy given the pace at which weed populations are evolving glyphosate resistance. New HR crop technologies will expand the utility of currently available herbicides and enable new interim solutions for growers to manage HR weeds, but will not replace the long-term need to diversify weed management tactics and discover herbicides with new modes of action. This paper reviews the strengths and weaknesses of anticipated weed management options and the best management practices that growers need to implement in HR crops to maximize the long-term benefits of current technologies and reduce weed shifts to difficult-to-control and HR weeds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.