ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2010
Development of a subject-specific model to predict the forces in the knee ligaments at high flexion angles.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Measuring stiffness of normal medial collateral ligament in healthy volunteers via shear wave elastography.Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2021Article
- A Combined Experimental and Computational Approach to Subject-Specific Analysis of Knee Joint Laxity.Journal of biomechanical engineering · 2016Article
- In vivo length change patterns of the medial and lateral collateral ligaments along the flexion path of the knee.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent clinical evidence has suggested that tasks performed in kneeling or squatting postures place the knee at a higher risk for injury because loads across the knee might overload the ligaments. The objective of this study was to develop a subject-specific model of the knee that is kinematically driven to predict the forces in the major ligaments at high flexion angles. The geometry of the femur, tibia, and fibula and the load-elongation curves representing the structural properties of the ACL, PCL, LCL, and MCL served as inputs to the model, which represented each ligament as a nonlinear elastic spring. To drive the model, kinematic data was obtained while loads were applied to the same cadaveric knee at four flexion angles. The force in each ligament during the recorded kinematic data allowed an optimization procedure to determine the location of the ligament attachment sites on each bone and their reference lengths. The optimization procedure could successfully minimize the differences between the experimental and predicted forces only when the kinematics at 90°, 120°, and 140° of flexion were utilized. This finding suggests that the ligaments at the knee function differently at high-flexion angles compared to low flexion angles and separate models must be used to examine each range of motion. In the future, the novel experimental and computational methodology will be used to construct additional models and additional knee kinematics will be input to help elucidate mechanisms of injury during tasks performed in kneeling or squatting postures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.