Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20585987›Full record

ArticleJournal of inherited metabolic disease2010

Congenital toxoplasmosis--a report on the Danish neonatal screening programme 1999-2007.

Dennis Röser, Henrik Vedel Nielsen, Eskild Petersen, Peter Saugmann-Jensen, Bent Nørgaard-Pedersen, Peter Bent Nørgaard-Pedersen

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of inherited metabolic disease, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Anti-Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Neglected parasitic infections in the United States: toxoplasmosis.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2014
    Article
  15. Decision analysis, economic evaluation, and newborn screening: challenges and opportunities.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2013
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
    Nørgaard-Pedersen, Peter Bent [corrected to Nørgaard-Pedersen, Bent]
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dennis RöserDepartment of Microbiological Surveillance and Research, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Henrik Vedel Nielsen
Eskild Petersen
Peter Saugmann-Jensen
Bent Nørgaard-Pedersen
Peter Bent Nørgaard-Pedersen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis paper reports on the national neonatal screening programme for congenital toxoplasmosis (CT) in Denmark conducted from 1999 to 2007, including background, basis for initiation of screening, methods, results, and finally reasons for the discontinuation of the screening.

methodsA nationwide screening was conducted at Statens Serum Institut, including >98% newborns, and using filter paper eluates (Guthrie card, PKU card) obtained from newborns 5-10 days old. These were analysed for Toxoplasma gondii-specific antibodies (IgM), and if positive, then IgM (ISAGA). Confirmatory serology was performed on children and their mothers (IgM, IgG, IgA, dye test) where infection was suspected, and children with suspected or confirmed CT initiated a 3-month treatment regimen with pyrimethamine, sulfadiazine and folinic acid supplements. Selective cohorts were followed with regard to developmental and clinical outcome.

resultsA total of 100 children were diagnosed with CT in the screening period, and only 2 cases were detected outside of the screening programme. CT prevalence was 1.6 per 10,000 live-born infants. Follow-up studies showed new retinochoroidal lesions in affected children despite treatment.

conclusionScreening was terminated August 2007, after it became apparent that no benefit of treatment could be shown. CT was evaluated using a Danish adaptation of the Uniform Screening Panel (ACMG), showing CT as an unlikely candidate for screening today. Whereas results might be comparable with other low-endemic countries with similar strains of T. gondii, neonatal screening and treatment might offer different results in regions with either high prevalence or different strains of T. gondii.

Indexed as

Neonatal ScreeningAntibodies, ProtozoanAntiprotozoal AgentsChildChild, PreschoolDenmarkDrug Administration ScheduleDrug Therapy, CombinationHumansImmunoglobulin MInfantInfant, NewbornLeucovorinNational Health ProgramsPredictive Value of TestsPrevalenceAntibodies, ProtozoanAntiprotozoal AgentsImmunoglobulin MLeucovorinPyrimethamineSulfadiazine

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.