Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20585970›Full record

ArticleCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS2010

The evolutionary context for a self-nonself discrimination.

Melvin Cohn

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Melvin CohnConceptual Immunology Group, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, 10010 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA, 92037, USA. cohn@salk.edu

Funding

EVOLUTIONARY MODELS OF THE IMMUNE SYSTEMR01RR007716 · NCRR · SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES · PI COHN, MELVIN · 1991 to 2010
$4.5M
NCRR NIH HHS R01 RR007716NCRR NIH HHS RR07716
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This essay was written to illustrate how one might think about the immune system. The formulation of valid theories is the basic component of how-to-think because the reduction of large and complex data sets by the use of logic into a succinct model with predictability and explanatory power, is the only way that we have to arrive at "understanding". Whether it is to achieve effective manipulation of the system or for pure pleasure, "understanding" is a universally agreed upon goal. It is in the nature of science that theories are there to be disproven. An experimentally disproven theory is a successful one. As they fail experimental test one by one, we end up with a default theory, that is, one that has yet to fail. Here, using the self-nonself discrimination as an example, how-to-think as I see it, will be illustrated.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionModels, ImmunologicalAutoimmune DiseasesHumansImmune SystemSelf ToleranceSignal Transduction

Identifiers

PMID20585970
PMCPMC2956437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.