Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20585550›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2010

Dynamic switch of negative feedback regulation in Drosophila Akt-TOR signaling.

Lutz Kockel, Kimberly S Kerr, Michael Melnick, Katja Brückner, Matthias Hebrok, Norbert Perrimon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Cytoplasmic fluidity couples nutrient availability and enterocyte fate in vivo.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. PANGEA: A New Gene Set Enrichment Tool forbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Development (Cambridge, England) · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. iProteinDB: An Integrative Database ofG3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. ADisease models & mechanisms · 2017
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lutz KockelDepartment of Genetics and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America. lutz.kockel@ucsf.edu
Kimberly S Kerr
Michael Melnick
Katja Brückner
Matthias Hebrok
Norbert Perrimon
University of California, San Francisco · USCell Signaling Technology (United States) · USHoward Hughes Medical Institute · US

Funding

Effects of Hedgehog Signaling on Pancreas OrganogenesisR01DK060533 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI HEBROK, MATTHIAS · 2003 to 2012
$3.3M
Network analysis of Signal TransductionR01DK088718 · NIDDK · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI PERRIMON, NORBERT · 2010 to 2014
$2.5M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK060533NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK088718PHS HHS 071982PHS HHS 120964
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Akt represents a nodal point between the Insulin receptor and TOR signaling, and its activation by phosphorylation controls cell proliferation, cell size, and metabolism. The activity of Akt must be carefully balanced, as increased Akt signaling is frequently associated with cancer and as insufficient Akt signaling is linked to metabolic disease and diabetes mellitus. Using a genome-wide RNAi screen in Drosophila cells in culture, and in vivo analyses in the third instar wing imaginal disc, we studied the regulatory circuitries that define dAkt activation. We provide evidence that negative feedback regulation of dAkt occurs during normal Drosophila development in vivo. Whereas in cell culture dAkt is regulated by S6 Kinase (S6K)-dependent negative feedback, this feedback inhibition only plays a minor role in vivo. In contrast, dAkt activation under wild-type conditions is defined by feedback inhibition that depends on TOR Complex 1 (TORC1), but is S6K-independent. This feedback inhibition is switched from TORC1 to S6K only in the context of enhanced TORC1 activity, as triggered by mutations in tsc2. These results illustrate how the Akt-TOR pathway dynamically adapts the routing of negative feedback in response to the activity load of its signaling circuit in vivo.

Indexed as

Signal TransductionAnimalsDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsEnzyme ActivationEpistasis, GeneticGenome-Wide Association StudyPhosphorylationProtein KinasesProto-Oncogene Proteins c-aktRibosomal Protein S6 Kinases, 70-kDaTOR Serine-Threonine KinasesAkt1 protein, DrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsProtein KinasesProto-Oncogene Proteins c-aktRibosomal Protein S6 Kinases, 70-kDatarget of rapamycin protein, DrosophilaTOR Serine-Threonine Kinases

Identifiers

PMID20585550
PMCPMC2887466
OpenAlexW2104855680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.