Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20585440›Full record

ArticleDose-response : a publication of International Hormesis Society2009

Low-dose cancer risk modeling must recognize up-regulation of protection.

Ludwig E Feinendegen, Myron Pollycove, Ronald D Neumann

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis Society, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03597360 (Low Dose Ionizing Radiation Using CT Scans as a Potential Therapy for Alzheimer's Dementia), which is not on this map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03597360 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Low Dose Ionizing Radiation Using CT Scans as a Potential Therapy for Alzheimer's Dementia (LDIR-CT-AD) Trial: A Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorBaycrestRan2019 to 2020Enrolled4ConditionsDementia AlzheimersArmsCT scan
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Marine Bacteria under Low-Intensity Radioactive Exposure: Model Experiments.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Correcting systemic deficiencies in our scientific infrastructure.Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis Society · 2014
    Article
  14. Low dose radiation adaptive protection to control neurodegenerative diseases.Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis Society · 2014
    Article
  15. Commentary: ethical issues of current health-protection policies on low-dose ionizing radiation.Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis Society · 2014
    Article
  16. Remedy for radiation fear - discard the politicized science.Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis Society · 2014
    Article
  17. Linear No-Threshold Model VS. Radiation Hormesis.Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis Society · 2013
    Article
  18. Commentary on fukushima and beneficial effects of low radiation.Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis Society · 2013
    Article
  19. A stochastic markov model of cellular response to radiation.Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis Society · 2011
    Article
  20. Residential radon appears to prevent lung cancer.Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis Society · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ludwig E FeinendegenHeinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf. Germany; and Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY, USA.
Myron Pollycove
Ronald D Neumann

Funding

Gene-targetted RadiotherapyZIACL060001 · CLC · CLINICAL CENTER · PI NEUMANN, RONALD · 2009 to 2012
$0k
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

IONIZING RADIATION PRIMARILY PERTURBS THE BASIC MOLECULAR LEVEL PROPORTIONAL TO DOSE, WITH POTENTIAL DAMAGE PROPAGATION TO HIGHER LEVELS: cells, tissues, organs, and whole body. There are three types of defenses against damage propagation. These operate deterministically and below a certain impact threshold there is no propagation. Physical-static defenses precede metabolic-dynamic defenses acting immediately: scavenging of toxins; - molecular repair, especially of DNA; - removal of damaged cells either by apoptosis, necrosis, phagocytosis, cell differentiation-senescence, or by immune responses, - followed by replacement of lost elements. Another metabolic-dynamic defense arises delayed by up-regulating immediately operating defense mechanisms. Some of these adaptive protections may last beyond a year and all create temporary protection against renewed potentially toxic impacts also from non-radiogenic endogenous sources. Adaptive protections have a maximum after single tissue absorbed doses around 100 to 200 mSv and disappear with higher doses. Low dose rates initiate maximum protection likely at lower cell doses delivered repetitively at certain time intervals. Adaptive protection preventing only about 2 - 3 % of endogenous life-time cancer risk would fully balance a calculated induced cancer risk at about 100 mSv, in agreement with epidemiological data and concordant with an hormetic effect. Low-dose-risk modeling must recognize up-regulation of protection.

Indexed as

adaptive protectionshormesisLow-dose cancer risk

Identifiers

PMID20585440
PMCPMC2889507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.