Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20585115›Full record

Trial reportAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2010

Pharmacokinetics of rifampin and clarithromycin in patients treated for Mycobacterium ulcerans infection.

J W C Alffenaar, W A Nienhuis, F de Velde, A T Zuur, A M A Wessels, D Almeida, J Grosset, O Adjei, D R A Uges, T S van der Werf

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Drugs for treating Buruli ulcer (Mycobacterium ulcerans disease).The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. An Overview of Various Rifampicin Analogs againstMedicinal chemistry (Shariqah (United Arab Emirates)) · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Pharmacologic management ofExpert review of clinical pharmacology · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Probable Buruli Ulcer Disease in Honduras.Open forum infectious diseases · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

J W C AlffenaarUniversity Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Department of Hospital and Clinical Pharmacy, P.O. Box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands. j.w.c.alffenaar@apoth.umcg.nl
W A Nienhuis
F de Velde
A T Zuur
A M A Wessels
D Almeida
J Grosset
O Adjei
D R A Uges
T S van der Werf
University Medical Center Groningen · NLJohns Hopkins Medicine · USUniversity of Groningen · NLKumasi Centre for Collaborative Research in Tropical Medicine · GH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In a randomized controlled trial in Ghana, treatment of Mycobacterium ulcerans infection with streptomycin (SM)-rifampin (RIF) for 8 weeks was compared with treatment with SM-RIF for 4 weeks followed by treatment with RIF-clarithromycin (CLA) for 4 weeks. The extent of the interaction of RIF and CLA combined on the pharmacokinetics of the two compounds is unknown in this population and was therefore studied in a subset of patients. Patients received CLA at a dose of 7.5 mg/kg of body weight once daily, rounded to the nearest 125 mg. RIF was administered at a dose of 10 mg/kg, rounded to the nearest 150 mg. SM was given at a dose of 15 mg/kg once daily as an intramuscular injection. Plasma samples were drawn at steady state and analyzed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectroscopy. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated with the MW/Pharm (version 3.60) program. Comedication with CLA resulted in a 60% statistically nonsignificant increase in the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) for RIF of 25.8 mg x h/liter (interquartile ratio [IQR], 21.7 to 31.5 mg x h/liter), whereas the AUC of RIF was 15.2 mg x h/liter (IQR, 15.0 to 17.5 mg x h/liter) in patients comedicated with SM (P = 0.09). The median AUCs of CLA and 14-hydroxyclarithromycin (14OH-CLA) were 2.9 mg x h/liter (IQR, 1.5 to 3.8 mg x h/liter) and 8.0 mg x h/liter (IQR, 6.7 to 8.6 mg x h/liter), respectively. The median concentration of CLA was above the MIC of M. ulcerans, but that of 14OH-CLA was not. In further clinical studies, a dose of CLA of 7.5 mg/kg twice daily should be used (or with an extended-release formulation, 15 mg/kg should be used) to ensure higher levels of exposure to CLA and an increase in the time above the MIC compared to those achieved with the currently used dose of 7.5 mg/kg once daily.

Indexed as

Antibiotics, AntitubercularBuruli UlcerChromatography, LiquidClarithromycinHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsRifampinTandem Mass SpectrometryAntibiotics, AntitubercularClarithromycinRifampin

Identifiers

PMID20585115
PMCPMC2935020
OpenAlexW2116006452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.