Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20585034›Full record

ArticleJournal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950)2010

The cell-specific induction of CXC chemokine ligand 9 mediated by IFN-gamma in microglia of the central nervous system is determined by the myeloid transcription factor PU.1.

Sally L Ellis, Vanessa Gysbers, Peter M Manders, Wen Li, Markus J Hofer, Marcus Müller, Iain L Campbell

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sally L EllisSchool of Molecular Bioscience and Bosch Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Vanessa Gysbers
Peter M Manders
Wen Li
Markus J Hofer
Marcus Müller
Iain L Campbell
Robert Bosch (Australia) · AUUniversity of Sydney · AU

Funding

CNS Pathobiology of IFN-inducible non-ELR CXC ChemokinesR01NS044905 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY · PI CAMPBELL, IAIN LESLIE · 2004 to 2008
$1.2M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS044905
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The IFN-gamma-inducible chemokines CXCL9 and CXCL10 are implicated in the pathogenesis of T cell-mediated immunity in the CNS. However, in various CNS immune pathologies the cellular localization of these chemokines differs, with CXCL9 produced by macrophage/microglia whereas CXCL10 is produced by both macrophage/microglia and astrocytes. In this study, we determined the mechanism for the microglial cell-restricted expression of the Cxcl9 gene induced by IFN-gamma. In cultured glial cells, the induction of the CXCL9 (in microglia) and CXCL10 (in microglia and astrocytes) mRNAs by IFN-gamma was not inhibited by cycloheximide. Of various transcription factors involved with IFN-gamma-mediated gene regulation, PU.1 was identified as a constitutively expressed NF in microglia but not in astrocytes. STAT1 and PU.1 bound constitutively to the Cxcl9 gene promoter in microglia, and this increased significantly following IFN-gamma treatment with IFN regulatory factor-8 identified as an additional late binding factor. However, in astrocytes, STAT1 alone bound to the Cxcl9 gene promoter. STAT1 was critical for IFN-gamma induction of both the Cxcl9 and Cxcl10 genes in microglia and in microglia and astrocytes, respectively. The small interfering RNA-mediated knockdown of PU.1 in microglia markedly impaired IFN-gamma-induced CXCL9 but not STAT1 or IFN regulatory factor-8. Cells of the D1A astrocyte line showed partial reprogramming to a myeloid-like phenotype posttransduction with PU.1 and, in addition to the expression of CD11b, acquired the ability to produce CXCL9 in response to IFN-gamma. Thus, PU.1 not only is crucial for the induction of CXCL9 by IFN-gamma in microglia but also is a key determinant factor for the cell-specific expression of this chemokine by these myeloid cells.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell LineCell LineageCells, CulturedCentral Nervous SystemChemokine CXCL10Chemokine CXCL9Interferon-gammaMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, KnockoutMicrogliaMyeloid CellsProto-Oncogene ProteinsProto-Oncogene Protein Spi-1STAT1 Transcription FactorChemokine CXCL10Chemokine CXCL9Cxcl10 protein, mouseCxcl9 protein, mouseInterferon-gammaProto-Oncogene ProteinsProto-Oncogene Protein Spi-1Stat1 protein, mouseSTAT1 Transcription FactorTrans-Activators

Identifiers

PMID20585034
PMCPMC2925661
OpenAlexW2120978524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.