Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20585027›Full record

ArticleFASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology2010

MR angiogenesis imaging with Robo4- vs. alphaVbeta3-targeted nanoparticles in a B16/F10 mouse melanoma model.

Kent S Boles, Anne H Schmieder, Alexander W Koch, Richard A D Carano, Yan Wu, Shelton D Caruthers, Raymond K Tong, Scott Stawicki, Grace Hu, Michael J Scott and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Nanotechnology for cancer treatment.Nanotechnology reviews · 2015
    Article
  9. Targeted nanotechnology for cancer imaging.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2014
    Review
  10. Molecular imaging for cancer diagnosis and surgery.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2014
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. New strategy for monitoring targeted therapy: molecular imaging.International journal of nanomedicine · 2013
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Vascular density and endothelial cell expression of integrin alpha v beta 3 and E-selectin in murine tumours.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2012
    Article
  17. Applications of nanotechnology in dermatology.The Journal of investigative dermatology · 2012
    Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Kent S BolesWashington University Medical School, St. Louis, MO 63108, USA.
Anne H Schmieder
Alexander W Koch
Richard A D Carano
Yan Wu
Shelton D Caruthers
Raymond K Tong
Scott Stawicki
Grace Hu
Michael J Scott
Huiying Zhang
Benton A Reynolds
Samuel A Wickline
Gregory M Lanza
Washington University in St. Louis · USWashington University Medical Center · USAlliance Protein Laboratories (United States) · USAngiogenesis Foundation · USResearch & Diagnostic Antibodies (United States) · US

Funding

UIUC Nanomaterials & Nanofabrication for Targeting CancerU54CA119342 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI WICKLINE, SAMUEL A · 2005 to 2009
$16.5M
COLLOIDAL IRON-OXIDE NANOBEACONS FOR THERANOSTIC USE IN ATHEROSCLEROSISR01HL094470 · NHLBI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI LANZA, GREGORY M · 2009 to 2010
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA119342NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL094470
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The primary objective of this study was to utilize MR molecular imaging to compare the 3-dimensional spatial distribution of Robo4 and α(V)β(3)-integrin as biosignatures of angiogenesis, in a rapidly growing, syngeneic tumor. B16-F10 melanoma-bearing mice were imaged with magnetic resonance (MR; 3.0 T) 11 d postimplantation before and after intravenous administration of either Robo4- or α(V)β(3)-targeted paramagnetic nanoparticles. The percentage of MR signal-enhanced voxels throughout the tumor volume was low and increased in animals receiving α(V)β(3)- and Robo4-targeted nanoparticles. Neovascular signal enhancement was predominantly associated with the tumor periphery (i.e., outer 50% of volume). Microscopic examination of tumors coexposed to the Robo4- and α(V)β(3)-targeted nanoparticles corroborated the MR angiogenesis mapping results and further revealed that Robo4 expression generally colocalized with α(V)β(3)-integrin. Robo4- and α(V)β(3)-targeted nanoparticles were compared to irrelevant or nontargeted control groups in all modalities. These results suggest that α(V)β(3)-integrin and Robo4 are useful biomarkers for noninvasive MR molecular imaging in syngeneic mouse tumors, but α(V)β(3)-integrin expression was more detectable by MR at 3.0 T than Robo4. Noninvasive, neovascular assessments of the MR signal of Robo4, particularly combined with α(V)β(3)-integrin expression, may help define tumor character prior to and following cancer therapy.

Indexed as

NanoparticlesAnimalsBiomarkersDisease Models, AnimalIntegrin alphaVbeta3MelanomaMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMicroscopy, FluorescenceMolecular ImagingNeovascularization, PathologicNerve Tissue ProteinsReceptors, Cell SurfaceReceptors, ImmunologicStaining and LabelingBiomarkersIntegrin alphaVbeta3Nerve Tissue ProteinsReceptors, Cell SurfaceReceptors, ImmunologicRobo4 protein, mouse

Identifiers

PMID20585027
PMCPMC3066028
OpenAlexW2134701147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.