Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20584276›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2010

Guidelines on uncomplicated urinary tract infections are difficult to follow: perceived barriers and suggested interventions.

Marjolein Lugtenberg, Jako S Burgers, Judith M Zegers-van Schaick, Gert P Westert

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05847036 (Profiles of Urinary Tract Infections in General Practice), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05847036 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Profiles of Urinary Tract Infections in General Practice : a Prospective Multicentre Cohort Study

TypeobservationalSponsorCNGE ConseilRan2023 to 2025Enrolled500ConditionsUrinary Tract Infections
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Primary care practitioners' experiences managing urinary tract infections: a qualitative evidence synthesis.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. BMC microbiology · 2017
    Article
  12. Optimizing the language and format of guidelines to improve guideline uptake.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2016
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marjolein LugtenbergScientific Centre for Transformation in Care and Welfare (Tranzo), Tilburg University, PO Box 90153, 5000 LE Tilburg, the Netherlands. m.lugtenberg@uvt.nl
Jako S Burgers
Judith M Zegers-van Schaick
Gert P Westert

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUrinary tract infections (UTI) are among the most common health problems seen in general practice. Evidence-based guidelines on UTI are available, but adherence to these guidelines varies widely among practitioners for reasons not well understood. The aim of this study was to identify the barriers to the implementation of a guideline on UTI perceived by Dutch general practitioners (GPs) and to explore interventions to overcome these barriers.

methodsA focus group study, including 13 GPs working in general practices in the Netherlands, was conducted. Key recommendations on diagnosis and treatment of uncomplicated UTI were selected from the guideline. Barriers to guideline adherence and possible interventions to address these barriers were discussed. The focus group session was audio-taped and transcribed verbatim. Barriers were classified according to an existing framework.

resultsLack of agreement with the recommendations, unavailable and inconvenient materials (i.e. dipslides), and organisational constraints were perceived as barriers for the diagnostic recommendations. Barriers to implementing the treatment recommendations were lack of applicability and organisational constraints related to the availability of drugs in pharmacies. Suggested interventions were to provide small group education to GPs and practice staff members, to improve organisation and coordination of care in out of hour services, to improve the availability of preferred dosages of drugs, and to pilot-test guidelines regionally.

conclusionsDespite sufficient knowledge of the recommendations on UTI, attitudinal and external barriers made it difficult to follow them in practice. The care concerning UTI could be optimized if these barriers are adequately addressed in implementation strategies. The feasibility and success of these strategies could be improved by involving the target group of the guideline in selecting useful interventions to address the barriers to implementation.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelGuideline AdherencePractice Guidelines as TopicUrinary Tract InfectionsAdultFamily PracticeFemaleFocus GroupsHumansNetherlandsPhysicians, Family

Identifiers

PMID20584276
PMCPMC2908068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.