Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20583853›Full record

ReviewDrugs & aging2010

Intanza 15 microg intradermal seasonal influenza vaccine: in older adults (aged >or=60 years).

Sean T Duggan, Greg L Plosker

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs & aging, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sean T DugganAdis, a Wolters Kluwer Business, Auckland, New Zealand. demail@adis.co.nz
Greg L Plosker
Wolters Kluwer Health · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intradermal seasonal influenza vaccine delivered by a microneedle injection system (Intanza) contains inactivated split virion antigens from influenza type A (H1N1 and H3N2) and B strains as recommended annually by the WHO and the EU for the prevention of seasonal influenza. In randomized, comparator-controlled, phase III trials in elderly volunteers, Intanza 15 microg elicited a strong immune response against influenza virus. In a pivotal trial, seroprotection rates with Intanza 15 microg were significantly greater than with the intramuscular comparator vaccine Vaxigrip (primary endpoint). A strong immune response was also observed with Intanza 15 microg following second and third annual vaccinations in consecutive seasons in terms of seroprotective antibody titres for all three strains (H1N1, H3N2 and B). In another phase III trial, Intanza 15 microg was as immunogenic as the intramuscular, adjuvanted vaccine Fluad, with noninferiority established in terms of ratios of geometric mean titres against H1N1 and B strains using the haemagglutinin inhibition method and against all three strains using the single radial haemolysis method. Intanza 15 microg was generally well tolerated in clinical trials in the elderly, with the most common adverse events observed being solicited injection-site reactions. The majority of solicited injection-site reactions were mild and spontaneously resolved within 1-3 days of onset; transient, visible injection-site reactions with the intradermal route of injection are not surprising as the vaccine is injected close to the skin surface.

Indexed as

AgedHumansInfluenza A Virus, H1N1 SubtypeInfluenza A Virus, H3N2 SubtypeInfluenza B virusInfluenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesInjections, IntradermalMicroinjectionsMiddle AgedInfluenza Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID20583853
OpenAlexW1971630539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.