ReviewDrugs & aging2010
Intanza 15 microg intradermal seasonal influenza vaccine: in older adults (aged >or=60 years).
Review in Drugs & aging, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nine μg intradermal influenza vaccine and 15 μg intramuscular influenza vaccine induce similar cellular and humoral immune responses in adults.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2014Trial
- Immunogenicity and safety of Intanza(®)/IDflu(®) intradermal influenza vaccine in South Korean adults: a multicenter, randomized trial.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2013Trial
- Improved immunogenicity of individual influenza vaccine components delivered with a novel dissolving microneedle patch stable at room temperature.Drug delivery and translational research · 2015Article
- Intanza (®) 9 µg intradermal seasonal influenza vaccine for adults 18 to 59 years of age.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2013Review
- Microneedle and mucosal delivery of influenza vaccines.Expert review of vaccines · 2012Review
- Microneedle vaccination with stabilized recombinant influenza virus hemagglutinin induces improved protective immunity.Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intradermal seasonal influenza vaccine delivered by a microneedle injection system (Intanza) contains inactivated split virion antigens from influenza type A (H1N1 and H3N2) and B strains as recommended annually by the WHO and the EU for the prevention of seasonal influenza. In randomized, comparator-controlled, phase III trials in elderly volunteers, Intanza 15 microg elicited a strong immune response against influenza virus. In a pivotal trial, seroprotection rates with Intanza 15 microg were significantly greater than with the intramuscular comparator vaccine Vaxigrip (primary endpoint). A strong immune response was also observed with Intanza 15 microg following second and third annual vaccinations in consecutive seasons in terms of seroprotective antibody titres for all three strains (H1N1, H3N2 and B). In another phase III trial, Intanza 15 microg was as immunogenic as the intramuscular, adjuvanted vaccine Fluad, with noninferiority established in terms of ratios of geometric mean titres against H1N1 and B strains using the haemagglutinin inhibition method and against all three strains using the single radial haemolysis method. Intanza 15 microg was generally well tolerated in clinical trials in the elderly, with the most common adverse events observed being solicited injection-site reactions. The majority of solicited injection-site reactions were mild and spontaneously resolved within 1-3 days of onset; transient, visible injection-site reactions with the intradermal route of injection are not surprising as the vaccine is injected close to the skin surface.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.