Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20583852›Full record

ArticleDrugs & aging2010

Statin prescribing in the elderly in the Netherlands: a pharmacy database time trend study.

Marjolein Geleedst-De Vooght, Anke-Hilse Maitland-van der Zee, Tom Schalekamp, Aukje Mantel-Teeuwisse, Paul Jansen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Drugs & aging, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Statin use among older Finns stratified according to cardiovascular risk.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2013
    Article
  14. Suboptimal use of statins at treatment initiation.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2011
    Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marjolein Geleedst-De VooghtLusse Pharmacy, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Anke-Hilse Maitland-van der Zee
Tom Schalekamp
Aukje Mantel-Teeuwisse
Paul Jansen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThere is some evidence that the beneficial effects of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) in the elderly are at least comparable to the effects in middle-aged people. However, several studies have shown prescription rates of statins to be significantly lower in the elderly than in younger populations.

objectiveThe aim of the present study was to monitor statin prescribing trends in the elderly in the Netherlands over time in terms of prevalence, incidence, type of statin, dose prescribed and adherence to clinical guidelines.

methodsThe database of a community pharmacy in Utrecht, which includes prescription data for approximately 11,000 people, was analysed to investigate trends in statin prescriptions from January 1999 to December 2008. The 1-year prevalence and incidence of statin use stratified by age were determined for each calendar year. Rate ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals were calculated with 1999 as the reference year. Furthermore, the following trends of interest were calculated for each calendar year: the percentage of statin users prescribed simvastatin or atorvastatin, the median dose of simvastatin and atorvastatin prescribed, and the percentage of simvastatin users prescribed a dosage of 40 mg/day (which is recommended by the Dutch multidisciplinary guideline).

resultsThe 1-year prevalence of statin use in medication users aged >or=50 years increased from 13.9% in 1999 to 22.8% in 2008 (RR 1.6; 95% CI 1.4, 1.9; p < 0.001). Overall, the lowest prevalence (5.1% in 1999 and 15.2% in 2008) and incidence rates (3.2% in 2000 and 4.2% in 2008) were found in patients aged >or=80 years. Before 2006, simvastatin was the most commonly prescribed statin, but the number of users declined as the percentage of patients with new simvastatin prescriptions decreased (from 43.4% in 2000 to 36.5% in 2005) and the percentage of patients treated with new atorvastatin prescriptions increased (from 37.7% in 2000 to 47.3% in 2005). As from 2006, when the Dutch multidisciplinary guideline for Cardiovascular Risk Management was introduced, recommending treatment with a daily simvastatin dose of 40 mg, the number of simvastatin users increased again and most treatment-naive patients were started on simvastatin (62.3% in 2006, increasing to 66.7% in 2008). The median simvastatin dose increased from 10 mg in 1999 to 20 mg in 2001, remaining at the same dose until 2008, and appeared to be related to the patient's age. From 2006, patients aged >or=80 years were the least likely group to receive the recommended dose of 40 mg simvastatin daily (10.0-20.0% of simvastatin users aged >or=80 years compared with 32.5-36.9% of simvastatin users aged 60-69 years).

conclusionDespite the benefits of statin treatment previously reported in older patients, the prevalence and incidence of statin use were lower in elderly patients compared with younger patients. In addition, lower dosages of statins were prescribed. These findings suggest the beneficial effects of statins in the elderly observed in clinical trials may not be achieved in everyday practice.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAtorvastatinCardiovascular DiseasesDatabases, FactualDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHeptanoic AcidsHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsPractice Guidelines as TopicPractice Patterns, Physicians'AtorvastatinHeptanoic AcidsHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsPyrrolesSimvastatin

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.