Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20583099›Full record

ArticleCurrent protocols in molecular biology2010

Bisulfite sequencing of DNA.

Russell P Darst, Carolina E Pardo, Lingbao Ai, Kevin D Brown, Michael P Kladde

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current protocols in molecular biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 112 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Genetic engineering ofMicrobial genomics · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. DNA methylation markers in the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma.European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990) · 2023
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. PSTVd infection inFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Russell P DarstUniversity of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Carolina E Pardo
Lingbao Ai
Kevin D Brown
Michael P Kladde
Florida College · USUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

Regulation of Gene Expression in ChromatinR01CA095525 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI KLADDE, MICHAEL P · 2003 to 2007
$1.3M
Nitrosourea-induced growth arrest and apoptotic pathwaysR01CA102289 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI BROWN, KEVIN D · 2004 to 2007
$900k
NCI NIH HHS BC062914NCI NIH HHS BC087311NCI NIH HHS CA102289NCI NIH HHS CA95525NCI NIH HHS R01 CA095525NCI NIH HHS R01 CA102289
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exact positions of 5-methylcytosine (m(5)C) on a single strand of DNA can be determined by bisulfite genomic sequencing (BGS). Treatment with bisulfite ion preferentially deaminates unmethylated cytosines, which are then converted to uracil upon desulfonation. Amplifying regions of interest from deaminated DNA and sequencing products cloned from amplicons permits determination of methylation at single-nucleotide resolution along single DNA molecules, which is not possible with other methylation analysis techniques. This unit describes a BGS technique suitable for most DNA sources, including formaldehyde-fixed tissue. Considerations for experimental design and common sources of error are discussed.

Indexed as

5-MethylcytosineDNASequence Analysis, DNASulfites5-MethylcytosineDNAhydrogen sulfiteSulfites

Identifiers

PMID20583099
PMCPMC3214597
OpenAlexW1895243739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.