Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20582594›Full record

Trial reportClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2010

One-year clinical outcomes with abciximab in acute myocardial infarction: results of the BRAVE-3 randomized trial.

Stefanie Schulz, K Anette Birkmeier, Gjin Ndrepepa, Werner Moshage, Franz Dotzer, Kurt Huber, Josef Dirschinger, Melchior Seyfarth, Albert Schömig, Adnan Kastrati and 1 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Stefanie SchulzDeutsches Herzzentrum, Technische Universität, Lazarettstrasse 36, 80636 Munich, Germany.
K Anette Birkmeier
Gjin Ndrepepa
Werner Moshage
Franz Dotzer
Kurt Huber
Josef Dirschinger
Melchior Seyfarth
Albert Schömig
Adnan Kastrati
Julinda Mehilli
Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité · DEGarmisch-Partenkirchen Medical Center · DEKlinikum rechts der Isar · DEWilhelminen Hospital · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn the Bavarian Reperfusion Alternatives Evaluation (BRAVE)-3 study upstream administration of abciximab additional to 600 mg clopidogrel loading did not reduce the infarct size in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary interventions. The aim of this study was to investigate 1-year clinical outcomes in the BRAVE-3 study patients.

methodsA total of 800 patients with acute STEMI within 24 h from symptom onset, all treated with 600 mg of clopidogrel were randomized in a double-blind fashion to receive either abciximab (n = 401) or placebo (n = 399) in the intensive care unit before being sent to the catheterization laboratory.

resultsThe main outcome of interest of the present study, the composite of death, recurrent myocardial infarction, stroke or revascularization of the infarct-related artery (IRA) at 1 year, was 23.0% (92 patients) in the abciximab versus 25.7% (102 patients) in the placebo group [relative risk (RR) = 0.90, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.67-1.20; P = 0.46]. The combined incidence of death, recurrent myocardial infarction or stroke was 9.3% in the abciximab group versus 6.0% in the placebo group (RR = 1.55, 95% CI 0.93-2.58; P = 0.09). There was a significant reduction of the IRA revascularization with abciximab compared to placebo (16.3 vs. 22.3%, RR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.52-0.98; P = 0.04).

conclusionIn patients with STEMI, all receiving 600 mg clopidogrel, abciximab did not improve overall clinical outcomes at 1 year after primary coronary stenting.

Indexed as

AbciximabAgedAngioplasty, Balloon, CoronaryAntibodies, MonoclonalClopidogrelDouble-Blind MethodDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansImmunoglobulin Fab FragmentsMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsRecurrenceAbciximabAntibodies, MonoclonalClopidogrelImmunoglobulin Fab FragmentsPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsTiclopidine

Identifiers

PMID20582594
OpenAlexW2138918962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.