Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20582573›Full record

ArticleJournal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine2010

Comparing respondent-driven sampling and targeted sampling methods of recruiting injection drug users in San Francisco.

Alex H Kral, Mohsen Malekinejad, Jason Vaudrey, Alexis N Martinez, Jennifer Lorvick, Willi McFarland, H Fisher Raymond

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 86 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
86citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

86 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 125 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Development and the Assessment of Sampling Methods for Hard-to-Reach Populations in HIV Surveillance.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article

26 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Alex H KralUrban Health Program, RTI International, 114 Sansome Street, Suite 500, San Francisco, CA 94104, USA. akral@rti.org
Mohsen Malekinejad
Jason Vaudrey
Alexis N Martinez
Jennifer Lorvick
Willi McFarland
H Fisher Raymond
San Francisco Department of Public Health · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USRTI International · USSan Francisco State University · USUniversity of California, Berkeley · US

Funding

Assessing Patterns of HIV Risk Among IDUs in Neighborhood Environments over TimeR01DA023377 · NIDA · RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE · PI KRAL, ALEXANDER H · 2009 to 2011
$1.4M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA023377NIDA NIH HHS R01DA023377
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this article is to compare demographic characteristics, risk behaviors, and service utilization among injection drug users (IDUs) recruited from two separate studies in San Francisco in 2005, one which used targeted sampling (TS) and the other which used respondent-driven sampling (RDS). IDUs were recruited using TS (n = 651) and RDS (n = 534) and participated in quantitative interviews that included demographic characteristics, risk behaviors, and service utilization. Prevalence estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to assess whether there were differences in these variables by sampling method. There was overlap in 95% CIs for all demographic variables except African American race (TS: 45%, 53%; RDS: 29%, 44%). Maps showed that the proportion of IDUs distributed across zip codes were similar for the TS and RDS sample, with the exception of a single zip code that was more represented in the TS sample. This zip code includes an isolated, predominantly African American neighborhood where only the TS study had a field site. Risk behavior estimates were similar for both TS and RDS samples, although self-reported hepatitis C infection was lower in the RDS sample. In terms of service utilization, more IDUs in the RDS sample reported no recent use of drug treatment and syringe exchange program services. Our study suggests that perhaps a hybrid sampling plan is best suited for recruiting IDUs in San Francisco, whereby the more intensive ethnographic and secondary analysis components of TS would aid in the planning of seed placement and field locations for RDS.

Indexed as

Epidemiologic Research DesignPatient SelectionResearch DesignAdolescentAdultBlack or African AmericanConfidence IntervalsFemaleHealth SurveysHepatitis CHIV InfectionsHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedNeedle-Exchange Programs

Identifiers

PMID20582573
PMCPMC2937131
OpenAlexW2102379400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.