Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20582399›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2010

Measuring smoking-related preoccupation and compulsive drive: evaluation of the obsessive compulsive smoking scale.

Brian Hitsman, Biing-Jiun Shen, Ronald A Cohen, Sandra B Morissette, David J Drobes, Bonnie Spring, Kristin Schneider, David E Evans, Suzy B Gulliver, Barbara W Kamholz and 2 more

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Brian HitsmanDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 680 N. Lake Shore Drive, Suite 1400, Chicago, IL 60611, USA. b-hitsman@northwestern.edu
Biing-Jiun Shen
Ronald A Cohen
Sandra B Morissette
David J Drobes
Bonnie Spring
Kristin Schneider
David E Evans
Suzy B Gulliver
Barbara W Kamholz
Lawrence H Price
Raymond Niaura

Funding

MULTIDISCIPLINARY CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE (MCTS) PROGRAM (UL1)UL1RR025741 · NCRR · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI GREENLAND, PHILIP · 2008 to 2011
$24.7M
Statistical Sciences CoreP50CA084719 · NCI · MIRIAM HOSPITAL · PI BUKA, STEPHEN L · 1999 to 2008
$17.8M
Phenomenology of the psychiatric smokerK23DA016138 · NIDA · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI KAMHOLZ, BARBARA W · 2003 to 2007
$683k
Effects of Nicotine in Smokers with Anxious MoodK23DA016376 · NIDA · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCE CTR · PI MORISSETTE, SANDRA BAKER · 2003 to 2007
$652k
Neurobehavioral Regulation of Cigarette CravingsK08DA017145 · NIDA · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI HITSMAN, BRIAN L · 2004 to 2008
$626k
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA084719NCI NIH HHS P50CA084719NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025741NIDA NIH HHS K08 DA017145NIDA NIH HHS K08DA017145NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA016138NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA016376
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleTobacco use for many people is compulsive in nature. Compelling theories of how smoking becomes compulsive exist but are largely based on extrapolation from neuroscience findings. Research on smokers is impeded, in part, by a lack of instruments that specifically measure compulsive smoking.

objectiveThis study evaluated the measurement structure and validity of the Obsessive Compulsive Smoking Scale (OCSS), a ten-item questionnaire designed to measure compulsive smoking.

methodsParticipants were 239 daily smokers (>/=1 cigarette/day), including 142 students at a public university in Chicago and 97 veterans treated at the VA Boston Healthcare System. The OCSS and questionnaires measuring current and past smoking, cigarette craving, automatic smoking, and nicotine dependence were administered.

resultsFactor analysis with maximum likelihood extraction and oblique rotation revealed two correlated underlying factors, interpreted as "Preoccupation with Smoking" and "Compulsive Drive." The measurement structure was consistent across students and veterans, and confirmed in an independent sample of adults (n = 95). Veterans exhibited higher OCSS scores (full scale and subscales) than students. Across groups, higher OCSS scores were positively correlated with smoking intensity, craving, and nicotine dependence. OCSS full-scale and compulsive drive scores, but not smoking preoccupation scores, were inversely correlated with past month smoking reduction and minutes since last cigarette.

conclusionsThe OCSS is a valid and reliable inventory for measuring the degree to which daily smokers are preoccupied with smoking and engage in compulsive tobacco use, and may be useful for advancing understanding of core smoking phenotypes or for tailoring cessation therapies.

Indexed as

Psychiatric Status Rating ScalesAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansLikelihood FunctionsMaleMiddle AgedObsessive-Compulsive DisorderPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSmokingStudentsSurveys and QuestionnairesTobacco Use DisorderUniversities

Identifiers

PMID20582399
PMCPMC2908436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.