ArticleStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2010
[Automated delivery of codes for charge in radiotherapy].
Article in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quality control of involved-field radiotherapy for patients with early stage Hodgkin's lymphoma based on a central prospective review. Comparison of the results between two study generations of the German Hodgkin Study Group.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2012Review
- [Survey of potential improvements during the course of the radiotherapy treatment--a patient questionnaire].Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeFor the medical billing of Radiotherapy every fraction has to be encoded, including date and time of all administered treatments. With fractions averaging 30 per patient and about 2,500 new patients every year the number of Radiotherapy codes reaches an amount of 70,000 and more. Therefore, an automated proceeding for transferring and processing therapy codes has been developed at the Department of Radiotherapy Freiburg, Germany. This is a joint project of the Department of Radiotherapy, the Administration Department, and the Central IT Department of the University Hospital of Freiburg. MATERIAL AND
methodsThe project consists of several modules whose collaboration makes the projected automated transfer of treatment codes possible. The first step is to extract the data from the department's Clinical Information System (MOSAIQ). These data are transmitted to the Central IT Department via an HL7 interface, where a check for corresponding hospitalization data is performed. In the further processing of the data, a matching table plays an important role allowing the transformation of a treatment code into a valid medical billing code. In a last step, the data are transferred to the medical billing system. RESULTS AND
conclusionAfter assembling and implementing the particular modules successfully, a first beta test was launched. In order to test the modules separately as well as the interaction of the components, extensive tests were performed during March 2006. Soon it became clear that the tested procedure worked efficiently and accurately. In April 2006, a pilot project with a few qualities of treatment (e.g., computed tomography, simulation) was put into practice. Since October 2006, nearly all Radiation Therapy codes (approximately 75,000) are being transferred to the comprehensive Hospital Information System (HIS) automatically in a daily routine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
20582395What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.