Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20582226›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of biological sciences2010

Water buffalo genome science comes of age.

Vanessa N Michelizzi, Michael V Dodson, Zengxiang Pan, M Elisabete J Amaral, Jennifer J Michal, Derek J McLean, James E Womack, Zhihua Jiang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of biological sciences, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Detection of Polymorphisms inAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  10. Molecular Characteristics and Polymorphisms of Buffalo (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. BioMed research international · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Genetic Association ofBioMed research international · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Vanessa N MichelizziDepartment of Animal Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164-6351, USA.
Michael V Dodson
Zengxiang Pan
M Elisabete J Amaral
Jennifer J Michal
Derek J McLean
James E Womack
Zhihua Jiang

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The water buffalo is vital to the lives of small farmers and to the economy of many countries worldwide. Not only are they draught animals, but they are also a source of meat, horns, skin and particularly the rich and precious milk that may be converted to creams, butter, yogurt and many cheeses. Genome analysis of water buffalo has advanced significantly in recent years. This review focuses on currently available genome resources in water buffalo in terms of cytogenetic characterization, whole genome mapping and next generation sequencing. No doubt, these resources indicate that genome science comes of age in the species and will provide knowledge and technologies to help optimize production potential, reproduction efficiency, product quality, nutritional value and resistance to diseases. As water buffalo and domestic cattle, both members of the Bovidae family, are closely related, the vast amount of cattle genetic/genomic resources might serve as shortcuts for the buffalo community to further advance genome science and biotechnologies in the species.

Indexed as

AnimalsBuffaloesGenomeIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescencePhylogenyCytogeneticsGenome biotechnology.Genome resourcesnext generation sequencingWater buffaloWhole genome mapping

Identifiers

PMID20582226
PMCPMC2892297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.