Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20581815›Full record

ArticleNature neuroscience2010

Therapy development in spinal muscular atrophy.

Michael Sendtner

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature neuroscience, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. The changing scene of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2013
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Developments in RNA splicing and disease.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2011
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael SendtnerInstitute for Clinical Neurobiology, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany. sendtner_m@klinik.uni-wuerzburg.de
University of Würzburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proximal spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is the predominant form of motor neuron disease in children and young adults. In contrast to other neurodegenerative disorders, SMA is a genetically homozygous autosomal recessive disease that is caused by deficiency of the survival motor neuron (SMN) protein. This homogeneity should in principle facilitate therapy development. Previous therapy approaches have focused on upregulation of SMN expression from a second SMN (SMN2) gene that gives rise to low amounts of functional SMN protein. Drug development to target disease-specific mechanisms at cellular and physiological levels is in its early stages, as the pathophysiological processes that underlie the main disease symptoms are still not fully understood. Mouse models have helped to make conceptual progress in the disease mechanism, but their suitability in the search for therapeutic agents remains to be validated--an issue that is ubiquitous to the translational therapeutic research of other neurodegenerative diseases. Human induced pluripotent stem cell technology for generation of large numbers of human motor neurons could help to fill this gap and advance the power of drug screening. In parallel, advances in oligonucleotide technologies for engineering SMN2 pre-mRNA splicing are approaching their first clinical trials, whose success depends on improved technologies for drug delivery to motor neurons. If this obstacle can be overcome, this could boost therapy development, not only for SMA but also for other neurodegenerative disorders.

Indexed as

AdolescentAnimalsChildDisease Models, AnimalGenetic TherapyHumansMiceMotor NeuronsMuscular Atrophy, SpinalPluripotent Stem CellsRNA SplicingSurvival of Motor Neuron 2 ProteinUp-RegulationYoung AdultSurvival of Motor Neuron 2 Protein

Identifiers

PMID20581815
OpenAlexW2091528846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.