Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20581280›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2010

Neuromuscular control of wingbeat kinematics in Anna's hummingbirds (Calypte anna).

Douglas L Altshuler, Kenneth C Welch, Brian H Cho, Danny B Welch, Amy F Lin, William B Dickson, Michael H Dickinson

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
92.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The spatiotemporal richness of hummingbird wing deformations.The Journal of experimental biology · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Wingbeat kinematics and energetics during weightlifting in hovering hummingbirds across an elevational gradient.Journal of comparative physiology. B, Biochemical, systemic, and environmental physiology · 2017
    Article
  7. Evolution of avian flight: muscles and constraints on performance.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Douglas L AltshulerDepartment of Biology, University of California at Riverside, Riverside, CA 92521, USA. douga@ucr.edu
Kenneth C Welch
Brian H Cho
Danny B Welch
Amy F Lin
William B Dickson
Michael H Dickinson
University of California, Riverside · USCalifornia Institute of Technology · USUniversity of California, San Diego · US

Funding

Neuromuscular control of flightF32NS046221 · NINDS · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI ALTSHULER, DOUGLAS L · 2003 to 2005
$140k
NINDS NIH HHS 5F32NS046221NINDS NIH HHS F32 NS046221
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hummingbirds can maintain the highest wingbeat frequencies of any flying vertebrate - a feat accomplished by the large pectoral muscles that power the wing strokes. An unusual feature of these muscles is that they are activated by one or a few spikes per cycle as revealed by electromyogram recordings (EMGs). The relatively simple nature of this activation pattern provides an opportunity to understand how motor units are recruited to modulate limb kinematics. Hummingbirds made to fly in low-density air responded by moderately increasing wingbeat frequency and substantially increasing the wing stroke amplitude as compared with flight in normal air. There was little change in the number of spikes per EMG burst in the pectoralis major muscle between flight in normal and low-density heliox (mean=1.4 spikes cycle(-1)). However the spike amplitude, which we take to be an indication of the number of active motor units, increased in concert with the wing stroke amplitude, 1.7 times the value in air. We also challenged the hummingbirds using transient load lifting to elicit maximum burst performance. During maximum load lifting, both wing stroke amplitude and wingbeat frequency increased substantially above those values during hovering flight. The number of spikes per EMG burst increased to a mean of 3.3 per cycle, and the maximum spike amplitude increased to approximately 1.6 times those values during flight in heliox. These results suggest that hummingbirds recruit additional motor units (spatial recruitment) to regulate wing stroke amplitude but that temporal recruitment is also required to maintain maximum stroke amplitude at the highest wingbeat frequencies.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaBirdsElectromyographyFlight, AnimalMaleMotor NeuronsPectoralis MusclesPeriodicityRecruitment, NeurophysiologicalWings, Animal

Identifiers

PMID20581280
PMCPMC2892424
OpenAlexW2148279377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.