ArticleThe Journal of physiology2010
Kinetic analysis of the effects of H+ or Ni2+ on Kv1.5 current shows that both ions enhance slow inactivation and induce resting inactivation.
Article in The Journal of physiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Gating and Regulation of KCNQ1 and KCNQ1 + KCNE1 Channel Complexes.Frontiers in physiology · 2020Review
- Regulation of human cardiac Kv1.5 channels by extracellular acidification.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2016Article
- Genetic ablation of CaV3.2 channels enhances the arterial myogenic response by modulating the RyR-BKCa axis.Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology · 2015Article
- Ca(V)3.2 channels and the induction of negative feedback in cerebral arteries.Circulation research · 2014Article
- ShakerIR and Kv1.5 mutant channels with enhanced slow inactivation also exhibit K⁺ o-dependent resting inactivation.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2013Article
- Nickel inhibits β-1 adrenoceptor mediated activation of cardiac CFTR chloride channels.Biochemical and biophysical research communications · 2013Article
- Molecular determinants of U-type inactivation in Kv2.1 channels.Biophysical journal · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
External H+ and Ni2+ ions inhibit Kv1.5 channels by increasing current decay during a depolarizing pulse and reducing the maximal conductance. Although the former may be attributed to an enhancement of slow inactivation occurring from the open state, the latter cannot. Instead, we propose that the loss of conductance is due to the induction, by H+ or Ni2+, of a resting inactivation process. To assess whether the two inactivation processes are mechanistically related, we examined the time courses for the onset of and recovery from H+- or Ni2+-enhanced slow inactivation and resting inactivation. Compared to the time course of H+- or Ni2+-enhanced slow inactivation at +50 mV, the onset of resting inactivation induced at 80 mV with either ion involves a relatively slower process. Recovery from slow inactivation under control conditions was bi-exponential, indicative of at least two inactivated states. Recovery following H+- or Ni2+-enhanced slow inactivation or resting inactivation had time constants similar to those for recovery from control slow inactivation, although H+ and Ni2+ biased inactivation towards states from which recovery was fast and slow, respectively. The shared time constants suggest that the H+- and Ni2+-enhanced slow inactivated and induced resting inactivated states are similar to those visited during control slow inactivation at pH 7.4. We conclude that in Kv1.5 H+ and Ni2+ differentially enhance a slow inactivation process that involves at least two inactivated states and that resting inactivation is probably a close variant of slow inactivation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.