Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20580969›Full record

ArticleMethods in enzymology2010

DNA curtains for high-throughput single-molecule optical imaging.

Eric C Greene, Shalom Wind, Teresa Fazio, Jason Gorman, Mari-Liis Visnapuu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in enzymology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 85 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
85citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

85 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. DNA curtains to visualize chromatin interactions.Methods (San Diego, Calif.) · 2023
    Article

25 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Eric C GreeneHoward Hughes Medical Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Shalom Wind
Teresa Fazio
Jason Gorman
Mari-Liis Visnapuu

Funding

Elucidating the Mechanisms of DNA RecombinationR01GM074739 · NIGMS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI GREENE, ERIC C · 2006 to 2015
$2.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM074739NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM074739NIGMS NIH HHS T32GM00879807
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single-molecule approaches provide a valuable tool in the arsenal of the modern biologist, and new discoveries continue to be made possible through the use of these state-of-the-art technologies. However, it can be inherently difficult to obtain statistically relevant data from experimental approaches specifically designed to probe individual reactions. This problem is compounded with more complex biochemical reactions, heterogeneous systems, and/or reactions requiring the use of long DNA substrates. Here we give an overview of a technology developed in our laboratory, which relies upon simple micro- or nanofabricated structures in combination with "bio-friendly" lipid bilayers, to align thousands of long DNA molecules into defined patterns on the surface of a microfluidic sample chamber. We call these "DNA curtains," and we have developed several different versions varying in complexity and DNA substrate configuration, which are designed to meet different experimental needs. This novel approach to single-molecule imaging provides a powerful experimental platform that offers the potential for concurrent observation of hundreds or even thousands of protein-DNA interactions in real time.

Indexed as

Microscopy, FluorescenceDNADNA Mismatch RepairMicrofluidicsNanotechnologyProteinsQuantum DotsDNAProteins

Identifiers

PMID20580969
PMCPMC7233429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.