Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20580356›Full record

ReviewFEBS letters2010

Comparative biology of telomeres: where plants stand.

J Matthew Watson, Karel Riha

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in FEBS letters, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Characterization of Repetitive DNA inFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Genome Sequence ofFrontiers in plant science · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Telomeric Repeat-Binding Factor Homologs inFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2018
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

J Matthew WatsonGregor Mendel Institute of Molecular Plant Biology, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna, Austria.
Karel Riha

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF Y 418
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Telomeres are essential structures at the ends of eukaryotic chromosomes. Work on their structure and function began almost 70 years ago in plants and flies, continued through the Nobel Prize winning work on yeast and ciliates, and goes on today in many model and non-model organisms. The basic molecular mechanisms of telomeres are highly conserved throughout evolution, and our current understanding of how telomeres function is a conglomeration of insights gained from many different species. This review will compare the current knowledge of telomeres in plants with other organisms, with special focus on the functional length of telomeric DNA, the search for TRF homologs, the family of POT1 proteins, and the recent discovery of members of the CST complex.

Indexed as

Plant Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsBase SequenceCaenorhabditis elegansDipteraDNADNA, PlantGenes, EssentialModels, MolecularPlant ProteinsPlantsProtein ConformationTelomeraseTelomereTelomeric Repeat Binding Protein 1DNADNA, PlantPlant ProteinsTelomeraseTelomeric Repeat Binding Protein 1

Identifiers

PMID20580356
PMCPMC3767043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.