Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20579885›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2010

Synergistic activation of phospholipase C-beta3 by Galpha(q) and Gbetagamma describes a simple two-state coincidence detector.

Finly Philip, Ganesh Kadamur, Rosa González Silos, Jimmy Woodson, Elliott M Ross

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. An integrated mechanism of GProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Light-sensitive CaProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  4. Biasing GMolecular pharmacology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. The mechanism ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Molecular regulation of PLCβ signaling.Methods in enzymology · 2023
    Review
  13. Coincident Regulation of PLCMolecular pharmacology · 2022
    Article
  14. Glucosylsphingosine evokes pruritus via activation of 5-HTBritish journal of pharmacology · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Cardiovascular therapeutics · 2020
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Finly PhilipDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 6001 Forest Park Road, Dallas, TX 75390-9041, USA.
Ganesh Kadamur
Rosa González Silos
Jimmy Woodson
Elliott M Ross

Funding

G Protein-Coupled Receptors-Structure and RegulationR01GM030355 · NIGMS · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI ROSS, ELLIOTT M · 1985 to 2015
$5.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM030355NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM030355
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReceptors that couple to G(i) and G(q) often interact synergistically in cells to elicit cytosolic Ca(2+) transients that are several-fold higher than the sum of those driven by each receptor alone. Such synergism is commonly assumed to be complex, requiring regulatory interaction between components, multiple pathways, or multiple states of the target protein.

resultsWe show that cellular G(i)-G(q) synergism derives from direct supra-additive stimulation of phospholipase C-beta3 (PLC-beta3) by G protein subunits Gbetagamma and Galpha(q), the relevant components of the G(i) and G(q) signaling pathways. No additional pathway or proteins are required. Synergism is quantitatively explained by the classical and simple two-state (inactive<-->active) allosteric mechanism. We show generally that synergistic activation of a two-state enzyme reflects enhanced conversion to the active state when both ligands are bound, not merely the enhancement of ligand affinity predicted by positive cooperativity. The two-state mechanism also explains why synergism is unique to PLC-beta3 among the four PLC-beta isoforms and, in general, why one enzyme may respond synergistically to two activators while another does not. Expression of synergism demands that an enzyme display low basal activity in the absence of ligand and becomes significant only when basal activity is </= 0.1% of maximal.

conclusionsSynergism can be explained by a simple and general mechanism, and such a mechanism sets parameters for its occurrence. Any two-state enzyme is predicted to respond synergistically to multiple activating ligands if, but only if, its basal activity is strongly suppressed.

Indexed as

Models, ChemicalAllosteric RegulationAnimalsEnzyme ActivationGTP-Binding Protein alpha Subunits, Gq-G11GTP-Binding Protein beta SubunitsGTP-Binding Protein gamma SubunitsHumansIsoenzymesLigandsMicePhospholipase C betaRatsGTP-Binding Protein alpha Subunits, Gq-G11GTP-Binding Protein beta SubunitsGTP-Binding Protein gamma SubunitsIsoenzymesLigandsPhospholipase C beta

Identifiers

PMID20579885
PMCPMC2918712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.