Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20579356›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental health : a global access science source2010

Self-reported exposure to pesticides in residential settings and risk of breast cancer: a case-control study.

Umar Farooq, Monika Joshi, Vinod Nookala, Pramil Cheriyath, Daniel Fischman, Nora J Graber, Steven D Stellman, Joshua Muscat

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental health : a global access science source, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. A case-control study of breast cancer risk and ambient exposure to pesticides.Environmental epidemiology (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2019
    Article
  3. Self-reported residential pesticide use and survival after breast cancer.International journal of hygiene and environmental health · 2019
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Umar FarooqDepartment of Internal Medicine, Harrisburg Hospital, Pinnacle Health Hospitals, Harrisburg, PA 17104, USA. ufarooq@pinnaclehealth.org
Monika Joshi
Vinod Nookala
Pramil Cheriyath
Daniel Fischman
Nora J Graber
Steven D Stellman
Joshua Muscat
Harrisburg Hospital · USPennsylvania State University · USColumbia University · US

Funding

SCIENTIFIC INFORMATION FACILITYP30CA017613 · NCI · INSTITUTE FOR CANCER PREVENTION · PI NIXON, DANIEL W · 1985 to 2005
$13.1M
Epidemiology of protein glutathiolationK07CA104231 · NCI · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI MUSCAT, JOSHUA E · 2005 to 2009
$681k
EPIDEMIOLOGY OF BREAST CANCER ON LONG ISLANDR01CA063021 · NCI · INSTITUTE FOR CANCER PREVENTION · PI STELLMAN, STEVEN D · 1994 to 1999
–
SERUM ORGANOCHLORINE COMPOUNDS AND BREAST CANCER ON LIR03CA072562 · NCI · INSTITUTE FOR CANCER PREVENTION · PI STELLMAN, STEVEN D · 1996 to 1996
–
NCI NIH HHS CA 104231NCI NIH HHS CA-17613NCI NIH HHS CA-63021NCI NIH HHS CA-72562
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPesticides are widely used in households to control insects and weeds. Several studies, over the past decades, have examined the possible relationship of serum concentration of organochlorine pesticides and the development of breast cancer. However, little data exists regarding an association between self-reported, residential exposure to pesticides and breast cancer risk. We, therefore, present a case-control study examining self-reported exposure to household pesticides with regard to associated risk of breast cancer.

methodsThis study was conducted in the area in and around New York City, NY and included 1205 patients (447 cases and 758 controls). Cases were defined as women with newly diagnosed breast cancer or carcinoma in-situ, while controls included women with benign breast diseases or those undergoing non-breast related surgery. All patients were asked a series of questions to determine their pesticide exposure, including the type of pesticide, location of exposure (inside vs. outside the home), who applied the pesticide (self vs. a professional) and duration of pesticide use. Logistic regression models were used to estimate unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios (OR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI).

resultsThe most common pests encountered in participants' homes were ants, carpenter ants, and cockroaches. The calculated adjusted odds ratios for both self and professionally applied pesticides, specifically against the above mentioned insects, with regard to breast cancer risk were 1.25 (95% CI: 0.79-1.98) and 1.06 (95% CI: 0.65-1.73), respectively. Similarly, odds ratios and confidence intervals were calculated for other types of pesticides.

conclusionsOverall, the results of our study did not show an association between self-reported exposure to pesticides and breast cancer risk. Future studies, utilizing a larger sample size and more specific detail on time frame of pesticide exposure, are needed to further explore this question.

Indexed as

AgedBreast NeoplasmsCase-Control StudiesDose-Response Relationship, DrugEnvironmental ExposureFemaleHerbicidesHousehold ProductsHumansInsecticidesMiddle AgedNew YorkOdds RatioPesticidesRisk FactorsHerbicidesInsecticidesPesticides

Identifiers

PMID20579356
PMCPMC2909990
OpenAlexW2112830154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.