Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20578247›Full record

ArticleJournal of cellular physiology2010

Local regulation of human breast xenograft models.

Jodie M Fleming, Tyler C Miller, Matthew J Meyer, Erika Ginsburg, Barbara K Vonderhaar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cellular physiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Early Radiation Therapy Response Assessment Using Multi-Scale Photoacoustic Imaging.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Rat Models of Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer.Journal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia · 2024
    Review
  5. The Power and Promise of Patient-Derived Xenografts of Human Breast Cancer.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2024
    Review
  6. CBD Inhibits In Vivo Development of Human Breast Cancer Tumors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Patient-Derived Xenograft Models in Breast Cancer Research.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021
    Review
  10. An engineered chimeric toxin that cleaves activated mutant and wild-type RAS inhibits tumor growth.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Disease models & mechanisms · 2017
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jodie M FlemingMammary Biology and Tumorigenesis Laboratory, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Tyler C Miller
Matthew J Meyer
Erika Ginsburg
Barbara K Vonderhaar
Center for Cancer Research · USNational Cancer Institute · USNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Isolation, Propagation and Characterization of Breast Stem CellsZIABC010768 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI VONDERHAAR, BARBARA · 2009 to 2010
$1.3M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA BC010768
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer studies implant human cancer cells under the renal capsule, subcutaneously, or orthotopically and often use estrogen supplementation and immune suppressants (etoposide) in xenograft mouse models. However, cell behavior is significantly impacted by signals from the local microenvironment. Therefore, we investigated how the combinatorial effect of the location of injection and procedural differences affected xenograft characteristics. Patient-derived breast cancer cells were injected into mouse abdominal or thoracic mammary glands +/- estrogen and/or etoposide pretreatment. Abdominal xenografts had increased tumor incidence and volume, and decreased latency (P < 0.001) compared to thoracic tumors. No statistically significant difference in tumor volume was found in abdominal xenografts treated +/- estrogen or etoposide; however, etoposide suppressed tumor volume in thoracic xenografts (P < 0.02). The combination of estrogen and etoposide significantly decreased tumor incidence in both sites. In addition, mice treated +/- estradiol were injected orthotopically or subcutaneously with well-characterized breast cancer cell lines (MCF7, ZR75-1, MDA MB-231, or MCF10Ca1h). Orthotopic injection increased tumor volume; growth varied with estrogen supplementation. Location also altered methylation status of several breast cancer-related gene promoters. Lastly, vascularization of orthotopic tumors was significantly enhanced compared to subcutaneous tumors. These data suggest that optimal xenograft success occurs with orthotopic abdominal injections and illustrate molecular details of the compelling influence of the local microenvironment on in vivo models.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDisease Models, AnimalTransplantation, HeterologousAnimalsAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicCell Line, TumorDNA MethylationEstrogensEtoposideFemaleHumansMiceMice, NudeNeoplasm TransplantationPromoter Regions, GeneticReceptors, EstrogenAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicEstrogensEtoposideReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, Progesterone

Identifiers

PMID20578247
PMCPMC2897719
OpenAlexW1975117851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.