Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20577875›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2010

Risk Management Plans: are they a tool for improving drug safety?

Serena Frau, Maria Font Pous, Maria Rosa Luppino, Anita Conforti

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Why maximum tolerated dose?British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2019
    Review
  3. Governance and pharmacovigilance in Brazil: a scoping review.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2016
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. A plea for a more epidemiological and patient-oriented pharmacovigilance.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2012
    Review
  10. Anything new in EU pharmacovigilance?European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2011
    Article
  11. Looking at EU pharmacovigilance.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Serena FrauDialogo sui Farmaci, Pharmaceutical Department, Verona Local Health Unit, Verona, Italy.
Maria Font Pous
Maria Rosa Luppino
Anita Conforti

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn 2005, new European legislation authorised Regulatory Agencies to require drug companies to submit a risk management plan (RMP) comprising detailed commitments for post-marketing pharmacovigilance. The aim of the study is to describe the characteristics of RMP for 15 drugs approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and their impact on post-marketing safety issues.

methodsOf the 90 new Chemical Entities approved through a centralised procedure by the EMA during 2006 and 2007, 15 of them were selected and their safety aspects and relative RMPs analysed. All post-marketing communications released for safety reasons related to these drugs were also considered.

resultsA total of 157 safety specifications were established for the drugs assessed. Risk minimisation activities were foreseen for 5 drugs as training activities. Post-marketing safety issues emerged for 12 of them, leading to 39 type II variations in Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC). Nearly half of such variations, 19 (49%), concerned safety aspects not envisaged by the RMPs. Besides this, 9 Safety Communications were published for 6 out of 15 drugs assessed.

conclusionThe present study reveals several critical points on the way RMPs have been implemented. Several activities proposed by the RMPs do not appear to be adequate in dealing with the potential risks of drugs. Poor communication of risk to practitioners and to the public, and above all limited transparency for the total assessment of risk, seem to transform RMPs into a tool to reassure the public when inadequately evaluated drugs are granted premature marketing authorisation.

Indexed as

Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsRisk ManagementGovernment AgenciesHumansMarketingSafety

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.