Trial reportInternational journal of hematology2010
Imatinib for newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia: results of a prospective study in Japan.
Trial report in International journal of hematology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Long-term outcome following imatinib therapy for chronic myelogenous leukemia, with assessment of dosage and blood levels: the JALSG CML202 study.Cancer science · 2012Trial
- Nilotinib as frontline therapy for patients with newly diagnosed Ph+ chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase: results from the Japanese subgroup of ENESTnd.International journal of hematology · 2011Trial
- Review
- A sharp fluctuation in peripheral blood cells shortly after dasatinib administration.International journal of hematology · 2012Article
- Berbamine overcomes imatinib-induced neutropenia and permits cytogenetic responses in Chinese patients with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia.International journal of hematology · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors at 19 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although imatinib has become the current standard treatment for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), there is limited information regarding its efficacy and safety among Japanese patients. We therefore conducted a prospective multi-center open-label study of imatinib for Japanese patients with newly diagnosed chronic-phase CML (CP-CML). A total of 107 patients were enrolled and treated with imatinib at an initial daily dose of 400 mg. Eighty-three patients completed 3 years of study treatment. The cumulative rates of major cytogenetic response and complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) were 90.9 and 90.2% at 3 years, respectively. The safety profile was not very different from that reported in the IRIS study, although grade > or =3 neutropenia occurred relatively frequently (31.8 vs. 14.3%). Only seven patients discontinued the study due to adverse events, as did four patients due to insufficient efficacy. The 3-year probabilities of overall survival and progression-free survival were 93.2 and 91.4%, respectively. Higher average daily doses (i.e., > or =350 mg) were significantly associated not only with higher rates of achieving CCyR, but also with longer duration of CCyR. These findings confirm the clinical utility of imatinib in Japanese patients with newly diagnosed CP-CML, and suggest detrimental effect of low average daily dose on treatment results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.