ReviewNeurochemical research2010
Proteomic studies on the development of the central nervous system and beyond.
Review in Neurochemical research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of plasma and cerebrospinal fluid proteomes identifies gene products guiding adult neurogenesis and neural differentiation in birds.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- [Study on expression and mechanism of serum differential proteins after rush immunotherapy of allergic rhinitis].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2020Article
- A multidimensional approach to an in-depth proteomics analysis of transcriptional regulators in neuroblastoma cells.Journal of neuroscience methods · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neuroproteomics has become a 'symbol' or even a 'sign' for neuroscientists in the post-genomic era. During the last several decades, a number of proteomic approaches have been used widely to decipher the complexity of the brain, including the study of embryonic stages of human or non-human animal brain development. The use of proteomic techniques has allowed for great scientific advancements, including the quantitative analysis of proteomic data using 2D-DIGE, ICAT and iTRAQ. In addition, proteomic studies of the brain have expanded into fields such as subproteomics, synaptoproteomics, neural plasma membrane proteomics and even mitochondrial proteomics. The rapid progress that has been made in this field will not only increase the knowledge based on the neuroproteomics of the developing brain but also help to increase the understanding of human neurological diseases. This paper will focus on proteomic studies in the central nervous system and especially those conducted on the development of the brain in order to summarize the advances in this rapidly developing field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.