Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20577759›Full record

ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2010

Laparoscopic appendectomy using a single polymeric clip to close the appendicular stump.

Lars Ivo Partecke, Wolfram Kessler, Wolfram von Bernstorff, Stephan Diedrich, Claus-Dieter Heidecke, Maciej Patrzyk

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07689123 (Evaluating the Outcome of Surgical Clip Versus Ligatures in Securing Base of Appendix in Laparoscopic Appendicectomy. A Randomized Controlled Single Blinded Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 32 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07689123 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Evaluating the Outcome of Surgical Clip Versus Ligatures in Securing Base of Appendix in Laparoscopic Appendicectomy. A Randomized Controlled Single Blinded Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversiti Sains MalaysiaRan2025 to 2026Enrolled64ConditionsAppendicitis (Diagnosis)Armssingle polymeric clip (XXL Click'aV Plus, Grena), suture ligature
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The use of polymeric clips in securing the appendiceal stump during laparoscopic appendicectomy: a systematic review.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Safety and Efficacy of Polymeric Clips for Appendiceal Stump Closure.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
    Trial
  8. Chronic pain from retained Hem-o-lokTranslational pediatrics · 2026
    Article
  9. Observational
  10. Comparison of three different methods for stump closure in laparoscopic appendectomy: Endoloop, Hem-o-lok clip, and endostapler.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2024
    Article
  11. Laparoscopic appendectomy, stump closure and endoloops: A meta-analysis.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lars Ivo ParteckeDepartment of General, Visceral, Thoracic, and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-University, Greifswald, Germany. partecke@uni-greifswald.de
Wolfram Kessler
Wolfram von Bernstorff
Stephan Diedrich
Claus-Dieter Heidecke
Maciej Patrzyk
Universität Greifswald · DEUniversitätsmedizin Greifswald · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, morbidity, and cost-effectiveness of the closure of the appendicular stump with a single non-absorbable polymeric clip compared with the closure of the appendicular stump with a stapler.

methodsFrom January 2009 to December 2009, 82 patients, 31 males and 51 females (mean age of 35.4 years; range of 17 to 79 years), were included in this prospective, non-randomized trial. In 56 patients, the appendicular stump was closed by staplers, and in 26 patients, a single Hem-o-lok MLX polymeric clip was applied. The data collected included age, sex, time of surgery, costs, time of hospitalization, day-time of surgery, complications, and preoperative white blood count (WBC) and c-reactive protein (CRP).

resultsThere were no differences between the two groups regarding age, sex, WBC, CRP, and time of hospitalization. Time of surgery was longer in the clip group due to the introductory phase. Morbidity did not differ significantly and was highly acceptable in both groups. The costs of one set of Hem-o-lock clips were negligible compared to staplers (19.94 euros versus 356.43 euros).

conclusionsThe use of a single non-absorbable polymeric clip is easy to use even for surgical trainees; it is safe and cost-effective. We suggest the use of a single clip for the closure of the appendicular stump as the standard procedure in laparoscopic appendectomy whenever possible.

Indexed as

PolymersSurgical InstrumentsSuture TechniquesAdolescentAdultAgedAppendectomyCost-Benefit AnalysisFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesPolymers

Identifiers

PMID20577759
OpenAlexW1969001880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.