Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20577267›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Immunology2010

Immune cell crosstalk in type 1 diabetes.

Agnès Lehuen, Julien Diana, Paola Zaccone, Anne Cooke

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Immunology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 253 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
253citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
15.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

253 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 468 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Sex as a modifier of genetic risk for type 1 diabetes.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2025
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

193 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Agnès LehuenInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) U986, Hôpital Saint Vincent de Paul, Bâtiment Petit, 82 Avenue Denfert-Rochereau, 75014 Paris, France. agnes.lehuen@inserm.fr
Julien Diana
Paola Zaccone
Anne Cooke
University of Cambridge · GBHôpital Saint-Vincent-de-Paul · FRInserm · FR

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/D522903/1Medical Research Council G0601174Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of type 1 diabetes involves a complex interaction between pancreatic beta-cells and cells of both the innate and adaptive immune systems. Analyses of the interactions between natural killer (NK) cells, NKT cells, different dendritic cell populations and T cells have highlighted how these different cell populations can influence the onset of autoimmunity. There is evidence that infection can have either a potentiating or inhibitory role in the development of type 1 diabetes. Interactions between pathogens and cells of the innate immune system, and how this can influence whether T cell activation or tolerance occurs, have been under close scrutiny in recent years. This Review focuses on the nature of this crosstalk between the innate and the adaptive immune responses and how pathogens influence the process.

Indexed as

AnimalsAutoimmunityDendritic CellsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1HumansImmunity, InnateInfectionsInsulin-Secreting CellsKiller Cells, NaturalLymphocyte ActivationLymphocytesMiceModels, ImmunologicalNatural Killer T-CellsRats

Identifiers

PMID20577267
OpenAlexW2093989792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.