ReviewAnnals of botany2010
Speciation genes in plants.
Review in Annals of botany, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 148 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
148 citing papers in PubMed, 342 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genomic incompatibilities are persistent barriers when speciation happens with gene flow in Formica ants.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Systematic Analysis of Reproductive Barrier Types and Strengths in Interspecific Hybridization InvolvingPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Fine Characterization of the Contact Zones ofEcology and evolution · 2025Article
- The molecular evolutionary basis of species formation revisited.Trends in genetics : TIG · 2025Review
- Ecological and Mutation-Order Speciation in Senecio.Molecular ecology · 2025Article
- Genome Architecture and Speciation in Plants and Animals.Molecular ecology · 2025Review
- Thrushes in Love: Extensive Gene Flow, With Differential Resistance and Selection, Obscures and Reveals the Evolutionary History of a Songbird Clade.Molecular ecology · 2025Article
- Synergies between speciation and conservation science yield novel insights for mitigating the biodiversity crisis of the Anthropocene.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Parallel loss of anthocyanins triggers the incipient sympatric speciation in an alpine ginger.Plant diversity · 2025Article
- Chromosomal structural variation loci HSS1 and HSS6 lead to hybrid sterility in rice.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025Article
- Genetic Basis of Reproductive Isolation in Torrey Pine (Evolutionary applications · 2025Article
- Introgression among subgroups is an important driving force for genetic improvement and evolution of the Asian cultivated riceFrontiers in plant science · 2025Review
- Genome-shock deletion of a hybrid lethality gene breaks a reproductive barrier and facilitates speciation inFrontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- From a bee's eye: Effects of UV bullseye size on reproductive success in a dioecious vinePlant diversity · 2024Article
- Beyond Haldane's rule: Sex-biased hybrid dysfunction for all modes of sex determination.eLife · 2024Review
- Genetic drift promotes and recombination hinders speciation on holey fitness landscapes.PLoS genetics · 2024Article
- The role of conflict in shaping plant biodiversity.The New phytologist · 2023Review
- Population Genomics of DomesticatedPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Genomic signatures of ecological divergence between savanna and forest populations of a Neotropical tree.Annals of botany · 2023Article
- Article
88 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAnalyses of speciation genes--genes that contribute to the cessation of gene flow between populations--can offer clues regarding the ecological settings, evolutionary forces and molecular mechanisms that drive the divergence of populations and species. This review discusses the identities and attributes of genes that contribute to reproductive isolation (RI) in plants, compares them with animal speciation genes and investigates what these genes can tell us about speciation. SCOPE: Forty-one candidate speciation genes were identified in the plant literature. Of these, seven contributed to pre-pollination RI, one to post-pollination, prezygotic RI, eight to hybrid inviability, and 25 to hybrid sterility. Genes, gene families and genetic pathways that were frequently found to underlie the evolution of RI in different plant groups include the anthocyanin pathway and its regulators (pollinator isolation), S RNase-SI genes (unilateral incompatibility), disease resistance genes (hybrid necrosis), chimeric mitochondrial genes (cytoplasmic male sterility), and pentatricopeptide repeat family genes (cytoplasmic male sterility).
conclusionsThe most surprising conclusion from this review is that identities of genes underlying both prezygotic and postzygotic RI are often predictable in a broad sense from the phenotype of the reproductive barrier. Regulatory changes (both cis and trans) dominate the evolution of pre-pollination RI in plants, whereas a mix of regulatory mutations and changes in protein-coding genes underlie intrinsic postzygotic barriers. Also, loss-of-function mutations and copy number variation frequently contribute to RI. Although direct evidence of positive selection on speciation genes is surprisingly scarce in plants, analyses of gene family evolution, along with theoretical considerations, imply an important role for diversifying selection and genetic conflict in the evolution of RI. Unlike in animals, however, most candidate speciation genes in plants exhibit intraspecific polymorphism, consistent with an important role for stochastic forces and/or balancing selection in development of RI in plants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.