Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20576611›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of biological chemistry2010

Alternative ways to think about cellular internal ribosome entry.

Wendy V Gilbert

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed, 122 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wendy V GilbertDepartment of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA. wgilbert@mit.edu
Massachusetts Institute of Technology · US

Funding

Mechanisms and Regulation of Yeast Internal Ribosome Entry SitesR00GM081399 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI GILBERT, WENDY VICTORIA · 2008 to 2010
$915k
NIGMS NIH HHS 5R00GM081399-03NIGMS NIH HHS R00 GM081399
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Internal ribosome entry sites (IRESs) are specialized mRNA elements that allow recruitment of eukaryotic ribosomes to naturally uncapped mRNAs or to capped mRNAs under conditions in which cap-dependent translation is inhibited. Putative cellular IRESs have been proposed to play crucial roles in stress responses, development, apoptosis, cell cycle control, and neuronal function. However, most of the evidence for cellular IRES activity rests on bicistronic reporter assays, the reliability of which has been questioned. Here, the mechanisms underlying cap-independent translation of cellular mRNAs and the contributions of such translation to cellular protein synthesis are discussed. I suggest that the division of cellular mRNAs into mutually exclusive categories of "cap-dependent" and "IRES-dependent" should be reconsidered and that the implications of cellular IRES activity need to be incorporated into our models of cap-dependent initiation.

Indexed as

AnimalsEukaryotic Initiation FactorsHumansModels, BiologicalProtein BiosynthesisRibosomesRNA-Binding ProteinsEukaryotic Initiation FactorsRNA-Binding Proteins

Identifiers

PMID20576611
PMCPMC2937932
OpenAlexW1965395430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.