Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20576332›Full record

ReviewClinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland)2010

Therapeutical use of probiotic formulations in clinical practice.

T Iannitti, B Palmieri

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 76 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Probiotics for people with hepatic encephalopathy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Probiotics and dietary intervention modulate the colonic mucosa-associated microbiota in high-fat diet populations.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2020
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

T IannittiDepartment of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK. tommaso.iannitti@gmail.com
B Palmieri

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND &

aimsThe spreading of gastrointestinal diseases is growing all over the world. Although for some of them an effective therapeutic approach has been found, palliation rather than cure is very frequent due to a partial knowledge of their aetiology and pathogenesis. This review, analyzing the main clinical studies, aims at being a state of the art update of the use of probiotic formulations in daily practice.

methodsIn this review we include all the most significant clinical trials involving the use of probiotic formulations for the treatment of several pathologies.

resultsDysbiosis has been observed in irritable bowel syndrome patients. Probiotics may exert a beneficial effect on Crohn's disease affected patients who have shown gut microbiota antigens and altered wall permeability. Moreover some probiotic formulations seem to enhance the therapy for Helicobacter Pylori reducing its pathogenic potential. Intestinal ecology imbalance has been also linked to cancer induction, allergy, skin and urogenital diseases. In addition probiotics administration seems to be particularly useful to ease post-operative complications.

conclusionFurther future clinical trials, involving large numbers of patients, will be mandatory to achieve definite evidence of the preventive and curative role of probiotics in medical practice.

Indexed as

Food SafetyMetagenomeAdministration, OralAntigens, BacterialCrohn DiseaseFemaleGastrointestinal DiseasesGastrointestinal TractHelicobacter pyloriHumansIntestinesMaleOligosaccharidesProbioticsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSkin DiseasesAntigens, BacterialOligosaccharides

Identifiers

PMID20576332
PMCPMC7172412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.