ArticleBrain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland)2010
WT1 is not a reliable marker to distinguish reactive from neoplastic astrocyte populations in the central nervous system.
Article in Brain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- WT1 Clone 6F-H2 Cytoplasmic Expression Differentiates Astrocytic Tumors from Astrogliosis and Associates with Tumor Grade, Histopathology, IDH1 Status, Apoptotic and Proliferative Indices: A Tissue Microarray Study.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2020Article
- Differential Expression of Wilms' Tumor Protein in Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma.Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology · 2019Article
- Wilms' Tumor Protein 1 and Enzymatic Oxidation of 5-Methylcytosine in Brain Tumors: Potential Perspectives.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2018Review
- Tumour-associated glial host cells display a stem-like phenotype with a distinct gene expression profile and promote growth of GBM xenografts.BMC cancer · 2017Article
- Increased expression of tumor-associated antigens in pediatric and adult ependymomas: implication for vaccine therapy.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2013Article
- WT1 protein expression in astrocytic tumors and its relationship with cellular proliferation index.Advanced biomedical research · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A diagnostic difficulty in neuropathology practice is distinguishing reactive from neoplastic astrocyte populations. This is particularly true in small biopsy samples that lack evidence of increased cellularity or mitotic activity, microvascular proliferation, or necrosis. We performed the current study to validate the previously reported finding that in the central nervous system, the expression of WT1 is limited to neoplastic astrocytes. We retrospectively studied WT1 protein expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in 100 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded brain tissue samples consisting of 3 normal control tissues, 44 cases of reactive gliosis, 49 gliomas and 4 lesions suspicious for glioma. In normal human cortex, WT1 staining was restricted to vascular endothelium. Most cases of reactive gliosis (82%) showed at least focal WT1 positivity, and analysis of specimens with electrode monitoring lesions showed an inverse relationship between WT1 expression intensity and the number of days from electrode placement to tissue resection. All glioma samples (100%) and all cases suspicious for glioma (100%) showed at least focal WT1 positivity. Our results likely differ from those in the prior report because of differences in tissue fixation and IHC methodology. Thus, our findings indicate that WT1 expression alone is not a reliable feature to distinguish reactive from neoplastic astrocytes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.