Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20576017›Full record

ArticleTransfusion2010

Enhanced classification of Chagas serologic results and epidemiologic characteristics of seropositive donors at three large blood centers in Brazil.

Ester C Sabino, Nanci A Salles, Moussa Sarr, Angela M Barreto, Marcio Oikawa, Cláudia D Oliveira, Silvana C Leao, Anna B Carneiro-Proietti, Brian Custer, Michael P Busch and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract readEvaluation StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Transfusion, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Prevalence of Trypanosoma Cruzi Infection in Blood Donors.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Lack of evidence of seronegative infection in an endemic area of Chagas disease.Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Anti-Trypanosoma cruzi inconclusive results in blood donor screening.Revista brasileira de hematologia e hemoterapia · 2012
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Ester C SabinoPró-Sangue Foundation and the University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. sabinoec@gmail.com
Nanci A Salles
Moussa Sarr
Angela M Barreto
Marcio Oikawa
Cláudia D Oliveira
Silvana C Leao
Anna B Carneiro-Proietti
Brian Custer
Michael P Busch
NHLBI Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor Study-II (REDS-II), International Component
Fundação Hemopa · BRFederal University of São João del-Rei · BRBlood Systems Research Institute · USFundação Centro de Hematologia e Hemoterapia de Minas Gerais · BRFundação Pró-Sangue Hemocentro de São Paulo · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BRWestat (United States) · US

Funding

NHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268200417175CODCDC CDC HHS HHSN268200417175C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA major problem in Chagas disease donor screening is the high frequency of samples with inconclusive results. The objective of this study was to describe patterns of serologic results among donors to the three Brazilian REDS-II blood centers and correlate with epidemiologic characteristics. STUDY DESIGN AND

methodsThe centers screened donor samples with one Trypanosoma cruzi lysate enzyme immunoassay (EIA). EIA-reactive samples were tested with a second lysate EIA, a recombinant-antigen based EIA, and an immunfluorescence assay. Based on the serologic results, samples were classified as confirmed positive (CP), probable positive (PP), possible other parasitic infection (POPI), and false positive (FP).

resultsIn 2007 to 2008, a total of 877 of 615,433 donations were discarded due to Chagas assay reactivity. The prevalences (95% confidence intervals [CIs]) among first-time donors for CP, PP, POPI, and FP patterns were 114 (99-129), 26 (19-34), 10 (5-14), and 96 (82-110) per 100,000 donations, respectively. CP and PP had similar patterns of prevalence when analyzed by age, sex, education, and location, suggesting that PP cases represent true T. cruzi infections; in contrast the demographics of donors with POPI were distinct and likely unrelated to Chagas disease. No CP cases were detected among 218,514 repeat donors followed for a total of 718,187 person-years.

conclusionWe have proposed a classification algorithm that may have practical importance for donor counseling and epidemiologic analyses of T. cruzi-seroreactive donors. The absence of incident T. cruzi infections is reassuring with respect to risk of window phase infections within Brazil and travel-related infections in nonendemic countries such as the United States.

Indexed as

AdultAlgorithmsBlood BankingBlood BanksBlood DonorsBrazilChagas DiseaseDonor SelectionFemaleHumansMaleSeroepidemiologic StudiesSerologic TestsTrypanosoma cruziYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID20576017
PMCPMC2997114
OpenAlexW1585498579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.