Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20574789›Full record

ArticleInvestigational new drugs2011

A phase I study of topotecan and gemcitabine in advanced solid tumors.

Derek S Serna, Tanios Bekaii-Saab, Eric H Kraut

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Investigational new drugs, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 91% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Derek S SernaDivision of Hematology and Oncology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Tanios Bekaii-Saab
Eric H Kraut
The Ohio State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeGemcitabine and topotecan are commonly used anti-tumor agents with a wide spectrum of activity in vitro and in vivo. A phase I trial of a combination of these two agents was initiated based on the premise that both gemcitabine and topotecan cause DNA damage and interfere with DNA repair by different mechanisms. Synergism has been demonstrated in vitro when gemcitabine and other topoisomerase I inhibitors have been combined. PATIENTS AND

methodsSeventeen patients with advanced solid tumors signed consent and were treated on this study with at least one cycle. Treatment consisted of gemcitabine at doses of 400 to 625 mg/m(2) days 1 and 5 in combination with topotecan at doses of 0.8 to 1 mg/m(2) given on days 2 through 5 every 21 days.

resultsThe dose limiting toxicities of granulocytopenia and thrombocytopenia were reached at the highest dose level of gemcitabine 625 mg/m(2) and topotecan 1 mg/m(2). A diffuse skin rash was also seen in four treated patients and responded well to treatment with steroids. One partial response and seven stable disease were seen as best response in 16 evaluable patients.

conclusionThe combination of gemcitabine and topotecan was found to be tolerable with interesting preliminary activity. The recommended phase II dose for this combination is gemcitabine at 500 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 5 with topotecan at 0.8 mg/m(2) on days 2 to 5.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsDeoxycytidineDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug SynergismFemaleGemcitabineHumansMaleMaximum Tolerated DoseMiddle AgedNeoplasmsTopotecanTreatment OutcomeDeoxycytidineGemcitabineTopotecan

Identifiers

PMID20574789
OpenAlexW2010900829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.