Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20574704›Full record

ArticleLa Radiologia medica2010

CT-guided needle biopsy performed with modified coaxial technique in the diagnosis of malignant lymphomas.

P Pedote, F Gaudio, M Moschetta, A Cimmino, G Specchia, G Angelelli

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in La Radiologia medica, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Imaging guided percutaneous renal biopsy: do it or not?Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

P PedoteDi.M.I.M.P. - Sezione di Diagnostica per Immagini, Policlinico Universitario, Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, Bari, Italy. pasqpedo@tin.it
F Gaudio
M Moschetta
A Cimmino
G Specchia
G Angelelli

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of was study was to evaluate the accuracy of computed tomography (CT)-guided core needle biopsy (CNB) performed by modified coaxial technique as an alternative tool to surgical biopsy in patients with suspected malignant lymphoma. MATERIALS AND

methodsBetween May 2005 and December 2008, 67 CT-guided CNB of deep lesions were performed on 64 patients with suspected malignant lymphoma. In 19 out of 64 patients (29.7%), recurrent lymphoma was suspected. A modified coaxial technique was used in all cases, and multiple samples were obtained for histological and immunohistochemical studies.

resultsA diagnosis of malignant lymphomas with specification of subtype according to the World Health Organization (WHO) classification was established in 41/67 cases. Other malignant neoplasms were found in 13/67, lymphoma without subtype specification was diagnosed in 7/67, whereas no conclusive diagnosis could be established in 6/67 cases. Overall diagnostic accuracy was 80.1%. In patients with a final diagnosis of malignant lymphoma, accuracy was 75.9%. No complications occurred.

conclusionsPercutaneous CT-guided CNB is a safe, effective and reliable tool in the management of lymphomas in patients without superficial lymphadenopathy and can be considered an alternative approach to surgical sampling. The modified coaxial technique represents an effective tool that has a good diagnostic accuracy value with a low complication rate.

Indexed as

Tomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiopsy, NeedleDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryLymphomaMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingRadiography, Interventional

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.