Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20574636›Full record

Trial reportAIDS and behavior2010

Feasibility and effectiveness of HIV prevention among wives of heavy drinkers in Bangalore, India.

Linda B Cottler, Veena A Satyanarayana, Catina C O'Leary, Krishna Vaddiparti, Vivek Benegal, Prabha S Chandra

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in AIDS and behavior, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of Community-Based Intimate Partner Violence Interventions in India.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Linda B CottlerDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO 63108, USA. cottler@epi.wustl.edu
Veena A Satyanarayana
Catina C O'Leary
Krishna Vaddiparti
Vivek Benegal
Prabha S Chandra
National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences · INWashington University in St. Louis · USInstitute of Human Behaviour and Allied Sciences · INSt. John's National Academy of Health Sciences · IN

Funding

T32 Training Grant in Epidemiology, Services and Prevention ResearchT32DA007313 · NIDA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI PRICE, RUMI KATO · 1999 to 2013
$2.9M
International Research Training in Clinical SciencesD43TW005811 · FIC · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI COTTLER, LINDA B. · 2001 to 2010
$1.8M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW005811FIC NIH HHS TW05811-08NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA007313NIDA NIH HHS T32DA07313-10
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Few studies have examined the effectiveness of community based HIV interventions for monogamous married women. We examined prevalence of risky behaviors and effectiveness of a Western intervention on increased knowledge and reductions in risky behaviors among wives of heavy drinkers in an urban slum in Bangalore, India. Household enumeration was conducted on 509 households; wives of the youngest married man 18-50 years of age who scored 8+ on the Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (AUDIT) were selected (N = 100) and assessed with Indian adaptations of the Substance Abuse Module (SAM), the Washington University Risk Behavior Assessment for Women (WU-RBA-W), the Violence Exposure Questionnaire (VEQ), the CES-D, the Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS-IV), and a Proxy AUDIT. After random assignment to either the Standard (Pre-post HIV counseling; N = 50) or the Enhanced Intervention (Standard + Body Wise Intervention; N = 50), women were re-assessed at 2 months; a 100% follow-up rate was achieved. Though no major intervention effects were found, at follow-up women were less likely to report victimization and perpetrated violence, more likely to feel empowered to make decisions about birth control, and were more knowledgeable about how to protect themselves from STDs and HIV. The findings have implications for HIV prevention among at risk monogamous women in community settings.

Indexed as

Poverty AreasRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSpousesAdolescentAdultAlcohol DrinkingCounselingFeasibility StudiesFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansIndiaMaleMiddle AgedUrban PopulationWomen's Health

Identifiers

PMID20574636
PMCPMC2956135
OpenAlexW2034551412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.